Autohost only non-em modes
Moderator: Oversight Staff
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Autohost only non-em modes
ENT dota community,
I would like to suggest for ENT to only host nonem modes. Due to few bugs, dota 6.78c is still being hosted. But, sooner or later we will be playing the new patches and em games are really shitty on it.
I would like to play nonem games at ENT instead of going back to cash and looking for nonem games there.
A lot of people still prefer playing nonem, but fact is, nonem games fill so ******* slow. Plz only host nonem modes since a nonem mode utilizes more individual skills and since it is the standard mode for dota.
I would like to suggest for ENT to only host nonem modes. Due to few bugs, dota 6.78c is still being hosted. But, sooner or later we will be playing the new patches and em games are really shitty on it.
I would like to play nonem games at ENT instead of going back to cash and looking for nonem games there.
A lot of people still prefer playing nonem, but fact is, nonem games fill so ******* slow. Plz only host nonem modes since a nonem mode utilizes more individual skills and since it is the standard mode for dota.
Re: Autohost only non-em modes
This suggestion would severely lower player-base. I know many people who only like to play EM for various reasons, and some of those people would leave. Plus, a variety of modes is a good thing. We already host both modes, so you can join just regular AP if you want to. They don't fill that slowly, not when you compare it to abal or ar (I do play AP from time to time).
People like playing apem for a reason, and taking away EM won't make people say, "Oh, I better go play AP." It will make people say "Oh, I better go play BGN/Void's apem."
People like playing apem for a reason, and taking away EM won't make people say, "Oh, I better go play AP." It will make people say "Oh, I better go play BGN/Void's apem."
- Iznogood
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Autohost only non-em modes
Ent currently have a few empty bots - by that I mean bot that hosts 10 games per week.
Making a non-em bot and try it out wouldn't hurt.. just my opinion
Making a non-em bot and try it out wouldn't hurt.. just my opinion

Re: Autohost only non-em modes
We already have non-EM bots. He's asking for nothing but non-EM bots.
- Iznogood
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Autohost only non-em modes
Seems like I've been a little sleepy while reading the above 
Makes no sense to remove the EM bots

Makes no sense to remove the EM bots

- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: Autohost only non-em modes
@Child u should know that pickerrrrs like u tend to fail on non-em
Anyways, I love non-em games, but the problem with that is that if opponent team gets pwned early game, there's usually no way back, unlike em where a mort for example may be 2-9 but able to carry the game after 40 secs. People choose to play em for a reason, so its not right to just stop hosting I guess...

Anyways, I love non-em games, but the problem with that is that if opponent team gets pwned early game, there's usually no way back, unlike em where a mort for example may be 2-9 but able to carry the game after 40 secs. People choose to play em for a reason, so its not right to just stop hosting I guess...

Re: Autohost only non-em modes
Aghnaar wrote:@Child u should know that pickerrrrs like u tend to fail on non-em![]()
Anyways, I love non-em games, but the problem with that is that if opponent team gets pwned early game, there's usually no way back, unlike em where a mort for example may be 2-9 but able to carry the game after 40 secs. People choose to play em for a reason, so its not right to just stop hosting I guess...
ya right nub... u euro have no understand of tru tru talent. i only pick skill #skillz heroes like barash, afk farm furi and pa. get on program

Re: Autohost only non-em modes
uakf.b wrote:We could host 6.78c for EM modes and 6.79 for non-em modes.
great idea imo
- coldfire786
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:32 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Autohost only non-em modes
It's a nice suggestion
But player who only play EM might move to other bots
But player who only play EM might move to other bots



Re: Autohost only non-em modes
uakf.b wrote:We could host 6.78c for EM modes and 6.79 for non-em modes.
I like that.
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: Autohost only non-em modes
uakf.b wrote:We could host 6.78c for EM modes and 6.79 for non-em modes.
If ENT will host new patches, I strongly agree that they should be nonem. The new updates are more based on nonem game modes rather than em modes.
So, making nonem games 6.79x is a great idea. May also motivate ppl who want to play the new updates on nonem.
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests