Autohost only non-em modes

Suggestions will be moved here once processed.

Moderator: Oversight Staff

User avatar
nabo.
Donator
Posts: 11892
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
Location: Dokdo, KOREA
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Autohost only non-em modes

Postby nabo. » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:30 pm

ENT dota community,

I would like to suggest for ENT to only host nonem modes. Due to few bugs, dota 6.78c is still being hosted. But, sooner or later we will be playing the new patches and em games are really shitty on it.

I would like to play nonem games at ENT instead of going back to cash and looking for nonem games there.

A lot of people still prefer playing nonem, but fact is, nonem games fill so ******* slow. Plz only host nonem modes since a nonem mode utilizes more individual skills and since it is the standard mode for dota.
Clan High@useast

  • Check the wiki for ENT rules and general information.
  • Talk to mods on ENT chat.
  • Host games through our bots, Manage your stats, Secure your account(s), and check your ban status on ENT LINK.

EdgeOfChaos

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby EdgeOfChaos » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:58 pm

This suggestion would severely lower player-base. I know many people who only like to play EM for various reasons, and some of those people would leave. Plus, a variety of modes is a good thing. We already host both modes, so you can join just regular AP if you want to. They don't fill that slowly, not when you compare it to abal or ar (I do play AP from time to time).

People like playing apem for a reason, and taking away EM won't make people say, "Oh, I better go play AP." It will make people say "Oh, I better go play BGN/Void's apem."

User avatar
Iznogood
Treant Protector
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby Iznogood » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:33 pm

Ent currently have a few empty bots - by that I mean bot that hosts 10 games per week.
Making a non-em bot and try it out wouldn't hurt.. just my opinion :)

EdgeOfChaos

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby EdgeOfChaos » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:53 am

We already have non-EM bots. He's asking for nothing but non-EM bots.

User avatar
Iznogood
Treant Protector
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby Iznogood » Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:18 am

Seems like I've been a little sleepy while reading the above :)
Makes no sense to remove the EM bots :o

EdgeOfChaos

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby EdgeOfChaos » Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:50 am

I agree. It would only cause harm.

User avatar
nabo.
Donator
Posts: 11892
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
Location: Dokdo, KOREA
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby nabo. » Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:52 am

Wanted to see if itll pass hahaha. Well I tried heh.
Clan High@useast






  • Check the wiki for ENT rules and general information.
  • Talk to mods on ENT chat.
  • Host games through our bots, Manage your stats, Secure your account(s), and check your ban status on ENT LINK.

child

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby child » Sun Dec 08, 2013 3:11 am

good suggestion. completely impractical. I miss -ar =(

User avatar
Aghnaar
Treant
Posts: 350
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 2:16 am

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby Aghnaar » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:05 am

@Child u should know that pickerrrrs like u tend to fail on non-em :lol:
Anyways, I love non-em games, but the problem with that is that if opponent team gets pwned early game, there's usually no way back, unlike em where a mort for example may be 2-9 but able to carry the game after 40 secs. People choose to play em for a reason, so its not right to just stop hosting I guess...
Image

child

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby child » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:39 am

Aghnaar wrote:@Child u should know that pickerrrrs like u tend to fail on non-em :lol:
Anyways, I love non-em games, but the problem with that is that if opponent team gets pwned early game, there's usually no way back, unlike em where a mort for example may be 2-9 but able to carry the game after 40 secs. People choose to play em for a reason, so its not right to just stop hosting I guess...


ya right nub... u euro have no understand of tru tru talent. i only pick skill #skillz heroes like barash, afk farm furi and pa. get on program :lol:

uakf.b
Staff Department
Posts: 7829
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby uakf.b » Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:50 pm

We could host 6.78c for EM modes and 6.79 for non-em modes.
dWFrZi5i -- 'cause I'm cool like Agreements

child

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby child » Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:04 am

uakf.b wrote:We could host 6.78c for EM modes and 6.79 for non-em modes.

great idea imo

User avatar
coldfire786
Treant Protector
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:32 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby coldfire786 » Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:08 pm

It's a nice suggestion
But player who only play EM might move to other bots
ImageImageImage

EdgeOfChaos

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby EdgeOfChaos » Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:41 pm

uakf.b wrote:We could host 6.78c for EM modes and 6.79 for non-em modes.

I like that.

User avatar
nabo.
Donator
Posts: 11892
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
Location: Dokdo, KOREA
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: Autohost only non-em modes

Postby nabo. » Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:07 am

uakf.b wrote:We could host 6.78c for EM modes and 6.79 for non-em modes.

If ENT will host new patches, I strongly agree that they should be nonem. The new updates are more based on nonem game modes rather than em modes.

So, making nonem games 6.79x is a great idea. May also motivate ppl who want to play the new updates on nonem.
Clan High@useast






  • Check the wiki for ENT rules and general information.
  • Talk to mods on ENT chat.
  • Host games through our bots, Manage your stats, Secure your account(s), and check your ban status on ENT LINK.


Return to “Suggestion Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests