Muddbutt@east

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

KuroSaki-
Resource Storage
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:27 pm

Muddbutt@east

Postby KuroSaki- » Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:30 pm

our battle.net username: KuroSaki-
Violator's battle.net username: muddbutt@east
Game name (if known): [ENT] DotA ap us/ca #22
Bot name (for example, ENT15): ENT5
Approximate date/time of game:
Rule player violated: Maphacking
Time of incidents: he teleported to the first and second rune perfectly with no vison
Any further thoughts:
fog clicking on pink with no vision
http://i.imgur.com/0ANO4.jpg
http://imgur.com/zPbOR.jpg

fog clicking on drow ranger with no vision
http://imgur.com/X4oLz.jpg
http://imgur.com/IxrA5.jpg

User avatar
teller55
Donator
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:15 pm
Location: Wisconsin, US
Contact:

Re: Muddbutt@east

Postby teller55 » Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:40 pm

I think uafk.b has now said that using the ingame Fogclicker gives an unfair advantage and looking at those screen shots definitely points that out and I most definitely agree. It tells you exactly what someone clicks on and when, using that is almost as bad as using the map hack itself.

I'll take a look at the replay, but my suggestion to you is to not use the ingame foggclicker in the future. If you suspect someone of mh'ing, use the Fogclicker on the replay to confirm your suspicions, not by you yourself getting an unfair advantage in the game.

Stats page link for him

EDIT: Alright, I've looked at the replay, and if he did Fogclick at those two times (I don't have the replay Fogclick detector, so I'm just going by looking at the replay at those times) he must have a mh, because he had no vision anywhere near those two players for an extended period of time.

!Support ban
Attachments
498563.w3g
Replay
(227.61 KiB) Downloaded 32 times
Last edited by teller55 on Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

uakf.b
Staff Department
Posts: 7829
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Muddbutt@east

Postby uakf.b » Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:58 pm

He's watching the replay, not necessarily using it in-game.
Edit: if you post images, you should post one with fog of war and one without fog of war at the same location.
dWFrZi5i -- 'cause I'm cool like Agreements

User avatar
teller55
Donator
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:15 pm
Location: Wisconsin, US
Contact:

Re: Muddbutt@east

Postby teller55 » Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:01 pm

uakf.b wrote:He's watching the replay, not necessarily using it in-game.
I know, I was just stating it because the two fogclicks that happened really didn't affect the game any (he click on two far off units and never did anything about them) so I wasn't sure what made him suspicious, unless it just seems that he had a general awareness of the map, so it made him check the replay. Just making sure :)

User avatar
adventureclub
Treant Protector
Posts: 930
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:53 am

Re: Muddbutt@east

Postby adventureclub » Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:02 am

Approved & banned for one year.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests