our battle.net username: KuroSaki-
Violator's battle.net username: muddbutt@east
Game name (if known): [ENT] DotA ap us/ca #22
Bot name (for example, ENT15): ENT5
Approximate date/time of game:
Rule player violated: Maphacking
Time of incidents: he teleported to the first and second rune perfectly with no vison
Any further thoughts:
fog clicking on pink with no vision
http://i.imgur.com/0ANO4.jpg
http://imgur.com/zPbOR.jpg
fog clicking on drow ranger with no vision
http://imgur.com/X4oLz.jpg
http://imgur.com/IxrA5.jpg
Muddbutt@east
Moderator: ENT Staff
Re: Muddbutt@east
I think uafk.b has now said that using the ingame Fogclicker gives an unfair advantage and looking at those screen shots definitely points that out and I most definitely agree. It tells you exactly what someone clicks on and when, using that is almost as bad as using the map hack itself.
I'll take a look at the replay, but my suggestion to you is to not use the ingame foggclicker in the future. If you suspect someone of mh'ing, use the Fogclicker on the replay to confirm your suspicions, not by you yourself getting an unfair advantage in the game.
Stats page link for him
EDIT: Alright, I've looked at the replay, and if he did Fogclick at those two times (I don't have the replay Fogclick detector, so I'm just going by looking at the replay at those times) he must have a mh, because he had no vision anywhere near those two players for an extended period of time.
!Support ban
I'll take a look at the replay, but my suggestion to you is to not use the ingame foggclicker in the future. If you suspect someone of mh'ing, use the Fogclicker on the replay to confirm your suspicions, not by you yourself getting an unfair advantage in the game.
Stats page link for him
EDIT: Alright, I've looked at the replay, and if he did Fogclick at those two times (I don't have the replay Fogclick detector, so I'm just going by looking at the replay at those times) he must have a mh, because he had no vision anywhere near those two players for an extended period of time.
!Support ban
- Attachments
-
- 498563.w3g
- Replay
- (227.61 KiB) Downloaded 32 times
Last edited by teller55 on Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Staff Department
- Posts: 7829
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:37 pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Muddbutt@east
He's watching the replay, not necessarily using it in-game.
Edit: if you post images, you should post one with fog of war and one without fog of war at the same location.
Edit: if you post images, you should post one with fog of war and one without fog of war at the same location.
dWFrZi5i -- 'cause I'm cool like Agreements
Re: Muddbutt@east
I know, I was just stating it because the two fogclicks that happened really didn't affect the game any (he click on two far off units and never did anything about them) so I wasn't sure what made him suspicious, unless it just seems that he had a general awareness of the map, so it made him check the replay. Just making sureuakf.b wrote:He's watching the replay, not necessarily using it in-game.

- adventureclub
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:53 am
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests