Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 076583.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #71
Your Warcraft III Username: noobacc
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
Violated Rule(s): Force to send, solosend
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): round 13, refusing to play in team
Any further thoughts:
Enemy team send 12, I told them not to send 13 since we maxed king after the send from t2 on 12.
Red and teal still solosend for lvl 13 and make us lose this game with that send.
We could easy just save for 17 and end them there but no they refuse to play in team and just solo send on 13.
Cost us the Game, also red isn't banned for the first time
[LTD] Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
Moderator: ENT Staff
- W0nderland
- Treant
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:04 pm
- Location: Germany, Cologne
- Been thanked: 1 time
[LTD] Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
Who the f&#k is General Failure and why is he reading my harddisk?
- SLSGuennter
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:39 am
- Location: Ingame ... most likely
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 102 times
Re: [LTD] Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
If 2 guys send together, its no solosend. 50% of the team decided to send.
Its more of bad communication/teamplay instead of solosend/teamkill.
Its more of bad communication/teamplay instead of solosend/teamkill.
Gunther and the Sunshine-Girls. Hell Yeah
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu May 18, 2017 5:20 pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: [LTD] Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
SLSGuennter wrote:If 2 guys send together, its no solosend. 50% of the team decided to send.
Its more of bad communication/teamplay instead of solosend/teamkill.
If you will apply that logic to every game, then two players can create new accounts and send every level without being banned for solo send? deciding not to send but instead go king on a sending lvl?
Theres is a clear difference between sending the level AFTER the enemy team sends and you have to max king and just 2 players sending for the sake of sending.
- W0nderland
- Treant
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:04 pm
- Location: Germany, Cologne
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: [LTD] Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
SLSGuennter wrote:If 2 guys send together, its no solosend. 50% of the team decided to send.
Its more of bad communication/teamplay instead of solosend/teamkill.
next time watch replay before u comment nonsense.
who the fuck send lvl 13, when enemy team send lvl 12?
its easy win to send lvl 15 or 17 than.
Who the f&#k is General Failure and why is he reading my harddisk?
- SLSGuennter
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:39 am
- Location: Ingame ... most likely
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 102 times
Re: [LTD] Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
Just cause they are "bad", doesnt mean they did tk on purpose ...
Gunther and the Sunshine-Girls. Hell Yeah
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:07 pm
- Location: Norway
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: [LTD] Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
I find it funny you want them to get banned for a send 50% of the team wants, when you earlier (level 5 to 7) solo upgraded the king and forced the rest of the team to upgrade the king aswell.
Eitherway its what Guennter said. Its not a solo send if two guys want to send 13 to try and kill the other team, and the other two want to send on level 15.
So the only one doing something against the rules in this game were infact you.
Eitherway its what Guennter said. Its not a solo send if two guys want to send 13 to try and kill the other team, and the other two want to send on level 15.
So the only one doing something against the rules in this game were infact you.
What did snow white say when the dwarves saw her naked?
7-UP
https://www.facebook.com/TehLurdOfTehReingsOfficial/videos/710971672378120/
7-UP
https://www.facebook.com/TehLurdOfTehReingsOfficial/videos/710971672378120/
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:12 pm
- Location: Россия
- Contact:
View first unread post
If you look at the title of the thread, there is a small arrow in a box facing down that takes you to the first new post in the thread.
- Jabba41
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 7435
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:56 pm
- Location: Germany - Hannover
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: [LTD] Albert_fish , Sniperthelittle
Back communication + in this situation one send isnt justifying a ban.
Denied
Denied
Send me your best Sloth pictures for instant unban*
*individual results may vary
*individual results may vary
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests