Lihl

[HealByColor]

I was wondering if there was a way to set up lihl as the 1100+ bot. Make it where you have to be vouched obviously. A on going bot that you can join and rehost etc. I think this will eliminate so many people waiting and also easier bot to maintain. a bot for 4v4 and make it where it can be hosted as low as a 2v2.

[SLSGuennter]

would cause problems with teamsettings. e.g. u need to let the bot autobalance then, but cant swap teams after it and so on. not a good idea imo

[Hutzu]

Just for info: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=44708

We changed the rules later on by staff-decision.

[eldryan]

it can be auto-set to captains mode pretty easily. or just remove swap, which really shouldn't be used much anyways. however, it would remove the activity in the channel, which would be bad.

[Diablo_]

I think that would work rather worse than currently. As eldryan said the LIHL channel is an important meeting point, not only to get games started but also for the community itself (chatting, playing other games etc). Also I think people will rather wait 5-10min for a game in the channel than in an almost empty game. Plus the other problems people mentioned (autobalance, game owner, ...)

[SLSGuennter]

@hutzu thats not the point. he want to have lihl as a always-on-bot with join-restriction, instead of starting games via channel-bot. at least thats what i did understand.

[Hutzu]

Ah! Well, I doubt that'd work.

[aRt)Y]

@hutzu thats not the point. he want to have lihl as a always-on-bot with join-restriction, instead of starting games via channel-bot. at least thats what i did understand.

He did get the point but having something autohosted means you wont necessarily join the lihl channel - which is all are afraid of. We should preserve the only real channel ENT still has on wc3.

[SLSGuennter]

yeah. i like chatting to other players on lihl channel and making jokes about gog

[aRt)Y]

Well, suggestion denied.