suggestion for LTD 2vs2

[aRt)Y]

There seem too many optional maps and modes to reach a consent, yet.

People should specify the details. - I added a poll, too.

[Merex]

-hpgmcb Legion TD x10

Good:
-Gets rid of crossing (Tested by myself with 2 friends, just simply doesn't work)
-Provides an extensive gameplay on legion itself
-Income boosted to 9/15 with the penalty of being much more expensive later (not really an issue imo)
-Buffs in various characters (lord of death, goliath, ghost (upgraded necro), troll champion etcetc
-Buffs on creeps prior to characters so definitely more challenging providing uses to other non-used characters in x3
-Simply a new map altogether to ENT, x10 has no prior history on being autohosted or played by regulars
-King's upgrades are buffed to 50, 30, 35 (hp, attack, regen)
--------
Bad:
-Bugs within certain characters
-Get's laggy late game (obv x10)
-Units actually get stuck more commonly here than x3 but antistuck solves this so
-x3 players adapting (personal opinion )

[aRt)Y]

6 votes is pretty low to get things going. Suggestion needs some activity before we consider adding another bot.

[nabo.]

This topic went from suggesting to host 2v2 LTD to 2v2 LTD x10.

@J4zZm4N
Post a new thread on autohost suggestion section for 2v2 LTD x10.

@uakf.b
Do the 4v4 LTD bots (ENT 18, 57, 96) have !votestart?
If not, votestart for 2v2 should be ok?

Edit:

Based on my experience,

ENT18 and 96 fill really fast usually, dont see how !votestart for 2v2 would be applicable most of the time.

ENT31 already has !votestart for 3v3. We could change this to 2v2.

If you guys want ENT31 to have 2v2, post a new suggestion.