separation between DOTA and other games

[Koby_Fish]

ENT DoTA needs to be its own thing separate from other non-DoTA ENT games. For instance, if someone's banned from dota games, they shouldn't necessarily be banned from non-DOTA games (except in say cases of maphack in games that have fog of war enabled). Games such as Gem TD and Werewolf Transylvania have nothing to do with DOTA at all, so if someone's been banned from a DOTA game committing an offence that is impossible to commit on other games (It is not useful to MH in Gem TD as there is no fog anyway, and it's impossible to "feed" in Werewolf Transylvania - you die once and that's it), there should be a way for them to play these other games.

There should also be a difference between self-hosted games and automatic bot hosted games.

[nabo.]

Self-hosted games or private games have their own bans: hosts have their own personal banlist they can manage.

Any bans on any autohosted games are shared. I do not see why a ban on dota should not affect a ban on legion td mega or vice versa. Why should we let a caught mher play on our other bots just so he can mh again?

[uakf.b]

Generally, we try to only ban players who are being assholes in one way or another. If they are being assholes in DotA then we don't need them in other games either.

[Stealer]

It wouldn't be much of a punishment for autobans if you could just play on a different bot anyways.

[matdas]

It wouldn't be much of a punishment for autobans if you could just play on a different bot anyways.

This.

If a player is banned from leaving a legion td. Then why should he be rewarded by being allowed to play dota when he ruined a ltd game? (Oh, its not dota, so he should play. Wrong, he ruined one game, what's to stop him from ruining another? A ban.)

That is the hole point.