Island defense rule

[BeeKauzh]

[Island defense rules]Any form of glitch abuse that negatively affects the game.
When I read this first I thought we were allowed to use glitches aslong as they don't affect the game but in reality any use of glitch is banned and jew acted tough on me. I suggest changing this line to something like this ''Any use of glitch'' this would make it clear that every glitch used will be banned and people who thinks like me would avoid getting banned for stupid reasons like misunderstanding the rule.

P.S. banned accounts are not authorized to see entgaming general rules (nonsense)

[aRt)Y]

Two things are wrong:
Firstly, how is wall glitching not negatively affecting the game for the titan? (viewtopic.php?t=35162)
Secondly, you can access everything on the wiki (http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?title=Main_Page), I am not sure what you are referring to..

[BeeKauzh]

Firstly, how is wall glitching not negatively affecting the game for the titan?

The titan sent a minion with 700hp to attack a wall and 30+ towers were focusing it (looks like suicide to me), would be dead in 3 seconds while with that glitch it survived about 8 seconds and ran back loosing focus, this thing does not seem negative for titan to me since it survived 5 seconds more. Minion was certainly dead if it stayed dead so in my mind a dead minion or a dead minion 5 seconds later does not affect the game.
My post is not about that it just is about changing the text of the rule to make it clear tho

[BeeKauzh]

@aRt)Y Let me try to clear what I'm asking you
[Island defense rules]Any form of glitch abuse that negatively affects the game.
Is the desired idea of this is ''any use of glitch is banned'' or is it ''any use of glitch that affects the game'' meaning that glitch that don't affect the game shouln't be banned? After being banned I am still confused and the second choice still seems logic to me, why would it be wrote like this if it is not the desired idea?
[EntGaming:General rules]Do not purposely glitch the game.
Again, is the desired idea is to not allow glitches in game or is it to not allow glitching the game itself (some next-level glitching I am unaware of)? Again, I am confused about that rule and I think the seconde choice is the most logic one, why would it be wrote like this if it not the desired idea? As I am not 100% sure those 2 are the desired idea, I suggest rewriting them in a more explicit way.
e.g.: No glitches are allowed.
If i am confused reading these rules then there are certainly other people who are also confused and this is why I think you should rewrite these 2 rules.

[aRt)Y]

General rules refer to all games to not use _any_ glitches.

Island Defense is kinda the same for public players unless you know what is allowed and what is not. Wall glitching which gives you an advantage is clearly unfair and therefore ban-able. Whether it was used 1 or 10 seconds doesn't matter.

As a player, you are not supposed to make usage of not things which were not designed or the original thought of the editor's.