http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?title=EntGaming:Ban
Maybe add that leavers are handled by autoban, and maybe that their ban duration keeps increasing each time. Seeing several people reporting leavers. Might save you guys some time.
Maybe add "(handled by autoban)" after "Do not leave before the game has certainly ended, especially if no other players have left." in here too http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?title=EntGaming:Rules
ENT Wiki suggestions
Moderator: Oversight Staff
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: ENT Wiki suggestions
Most people know that leaving = ban by the bot. But, they dont know that all leave bans are taken care by autoban. Leave bans depend more on user's leave frequency rather than how much impact leaving caused to the game. People think that due to different degrees of game impact, they can report for a longer ban.
Not sure, if need be, but may be @art)y will want to clarify on wiki.
Not sure, if need be, but may be @art)y will want to clarify on wiki.
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: ENT Wiki suggestions
The only issue I see is that ENT bans differently for autoban. For some games, it doesn't due to the low impact (or none at all) and for some it bans. It would be too much to add that part, considering it is 1-2 pages in the staff handbook.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
- Hutzu
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 4117
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:48 pm
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: ENT Wiki suggestions
@art)Y Is a full explanation necessary though? Would my version work? Putting "[Leavers are] handled by autoban", could be enough.
I was just thinking about getting some work off your backs. But if the rules would get too complicated and maybe cause other questions/brqs popping up like "You say handled by autoban, but player still not banned!!!!!111 omgz lolz" or so, then keep it is as it is. Thanks for your time and consideration!
I was just thinking about getting some work off your backs. But if the rules would get too complicated and maybe cause other questions/brqs popping up like "You say handled by autoban, but player still not banned!!!!!111 omgz lolz" or so, then keep it is as it is. Thanks for your time and consideration!
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: ENT Wiki suggestions
Hutzu wrote:"[Leavers are] handled by autoban", could be enough.
The problem is, that is only semi-true. As mentioned, not all games ban for leaving.
Thanks for the suggestion but it could cause confusion than it helps.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests