Your Warcraft III username: allemanus
Violator's Warcraft III username: pro.
Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #13
Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=3155571
Rule player violated: Deliberately helping the enemy team
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): 36:11
Any further thoughts: pro. was a pain in the ass from second one. He occupied mid despite I was already there and fed , what could have cost our game. After nine minutes one by one decided to !ff but teal (pro.) didn't want to, so we had to play. After a long game (with 3 feeder!!), purple and me mangaged to turn the tide to our teams favor, but then teal started to threaten us with
(29:55) pro.: i am the last one to type
(30:01) pro.: shall i type?
(31:47) pro.: shall i type !ff?
I told him that this would end with a ban but he just called me a moron. In the moment we raxed their third side, teal wrote !ff and gave the game away. If he had written it in the beginning, when we all thought it was over, i wouldn't have any prob with it, but after 36 minutes and us winning he wrote !ff. Dota doesn't need such players!!
[DOTA] pro. europe.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: [DOTA] pro. europe.battle.net
(08:40 / Allied) tbrchar: !ff
(10:52 / Allied) allemanus: !ff
(10:56 / Allied) tbrchar: !ff
(13:39 / Allied) Pipita_92: !ff
(15:26 / Allied) LoVE_LiVE: !ff
(36:11 / All) pro.: !ff
Should not !ff unless 100% totally given up.
Technically, pro. did not abuse or broke any rule. So, no ban for him.
Sniper ended up with a kd score of 8/10, doesnt seem enough feed for a ban.
But, I will investigate further about similar cases of !ff such as this and see whether there needs a !ff cancel or !unff or something. Thanks for reporting.
@allemanus plz read my pm
(10:52 / Allied) allemanus: !ff
(10:56 / Allied) tbrchar: !ff
(13:39 / Allied) Pipita_92: !ff
(15:26 / Allied) LoVE_LiVE: !ff
(36:11 / All) pro.: !ff
Should not !ff unless 100% totally given up.
Technically, pro. did not abuse or broke any rule. So, no ban for him.
Sniper ended up with a kd score of 8/10, doesnt seem enough feed for a ban.
But, I will investigate further about similar cases of !ff such as this and see whether there needs a !ff cancel or !unff or something. Thanks for reporting.
@allemanus plz read my pm
- Attachments
-
- !ff misconception abuse.w3g
- (307.83 KiB) Downloaded 29 times
Re: [DOTA] pro. europe.battle.net
@nabo. i didn't watch the replay, but if it's clear their side was going to win without a doubt (mega creeps did they have?) then this qualifies as game ruining IMO and I would ban this guy for a week.
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: [DOTA] pro. europe.battle.net
@child
I debated over this.
But technically, pro. didnt violate any rule. He trolled, but he typed !ff because he had w.e reason to give up the game.
It is also partially the other teammembers' fault for giving up so early.
I blame the ff system more than pro. for this happening.
I debated over this.
But technically, pro. didnt violate any rule. He trolled, but he typed !ff because he had w.e reason to give up the game.
It is also partially the other teammembers' fault for giving up so early.
I blame the ff system more than pro. for this happening.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests