3.41 & 3.5 same elo, WHY?!

[Akitos]

I just discovered that those 2 versions share the same frkn elo, why is that?! They have completly different tactics as there are lots of new towers & more and someone that's good in 3.5 must not be so good in 3.41 and the other way around, so why would both have the same elo? And how come i seem to be the only one not liking this and/or to question it, or am i too dumb for search function again? Who came up with this idea anyway?! Is there any smart thinking behind this? 'Cuz i really can't figure out why anyone would possibly not seperate these 2. Was it too much work? Or other reasons? Please help me understand 'cuz it makes no frkn sense to me

[Krumme]

I tend to agree that there should be different ELO systems and I actually assumed they had that but personally I started playing 3.5 only and now changed to 3.41 only so I guess it could be that most people only play 1 of the 2 games?

[Akitos]

Well, as far as i've heard it's alot easier for premade teams to win in 3.5 as the overall niveau there isn't as high as on 3.41 and that's why some people are pushing there. There should definitly be seperate elos, but that'd require a elo reset and i'm sure some people will be butthurt about that.

[nabo.]

Still the same 4v4 legion td with bit different strategies and a hero.

Not sure why u need to cry about player base...sounds like u r more butthurt that some ppl play more ltd 3.5 and get "easier" elo according to ur own definitions. Competitive lvl or general skill lvl of players may differ, but dont see how it is a reason to complain about over elo win or loss.

If there are more higher elos on 3.41 shouldnt u be happy that there r more player u can steal elo from? I dont get it.

Yes, stats could be separate between the two, but really, i dont see why it couldnt be same either. More similarities than the few "differences".

Anyway, if u would like to make a suggestion and create a separate ltd 3.5 stats category, post: viewforum.php?f=9

[Akitos]

I'm not butthurt at all i just think it's stupid to have the same elo for two different maps and you clearly missed my point & the context of it... With the elo pushing i was only answering to Krumme who stated that alot may only play one of the two maps, it was by far not my main argument, nor a real argument at all, to seperate these two The one and only reason they should be seperate is because they're frkn different! That's all! It's like a WoW private server having the same ladder for two different addons and people like mr nabo here saying something like this: "It's still the same WoW with a bit different strategies and a new class. Yes, stats could be separate between the two, but really, i dont see why it couldnt be same either. More similarities than the few "differences". It's still WoW." It's just nonsense, there is NO reason for them to have the same elo and i'll sure make this suggestion soon.