ren_sha@europe.battle.net, zlBloodHunterlz@garena

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Cleobattler
Armored Tree
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:44 pm

ren_sha@europe.battle.net, zlBloodHunterlz@garena

Postby Cleobattler » Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:37 am

Your Warcraft III username: Cleobattler@garena

Violator's Warcraft III username: ren_sha@europe.battle.net, zlBloodHunterlz@garena

Game name or map name: Tom and Jerry 2013 v2.00

Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2448314

Rule player violated: Abusing barricades

Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): 0:29, 2:13

Any further thoughts:

Starting at around 0:29, the blue player zlBloodHunterlz began spamming unnecessary barricades in the red player's base to annoy him. His unnecessary barricades' intention was obviously malicious and not for the purpose of defence. Blue then claimed the 10 o'clock mine legally, but at around 2:13 the red player ren_sha began retaliating by spamming just as many unnecessary barricades in blue's base. I advised them to stop such immature actions but they refused to listen. Blue then removed his unnecessary walls, but he already delayed red's altar, blacksmith, and lumber mill by a considerable duration.

Blue violated the rules in F9 by spamming unnecessary barricades in red's base without permission, but red's also guilty for violating the rules just to retaliate. Thus both players violated the rules and should be banned.

child

Re: ren_sha@europe.battle.net, zlBloodHunterlz@garena

Postby child » Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:17 pm

banned bloodhunter for 2 days. banning ren for 6 hours, as he in no way initiated this conflict and only retaliated to bullying to a much lesser extent than the original offender.

also doesnt it say in the rules stipulated in f9 that map hack is bannable? :lol:


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests