Risk Devolution 2.3b bot hosted by RNG observations

Suggestions will be moved here once processed.

Moderator: Oversight Staff

iownyaMouse
Resource Storage
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 11:33 am

Risk Devolution 2.3b bot hosted by RNG observations

Postby iownyaMouse » Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:45 pm

Hi all

EDITED

As the two week period has passed since RNG took over Risk Devo 2.3b hosting from ENT, we would like to give a short report as to the situation.

There has been some issues with the way RNG manages the bots, however fortunately we have been able to come to an agreement before things get out of hand. We appreciate the help ENT provides to its players and we would like for the ENT group to continue its support to the community.

At this point we do not require ENT to reactivate their Risk Devo bot ENT87 and we appreciate the ENT group for being there should we require their help.

Thank you
Last edited by iownyaMouse on Sat Jul 06, 2013 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

burnjehova
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:30 am

Re: [ENT] Risk Devolution 2.3b bot required

Postby burnjehova » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:39 am

I support iownyamouse's post. The owner of RNG has been banning people compltely unmerited. Personally I was banned for questioning his actions in our clan's chat channel. Since ENT took down their hostbot he(the owner of RNG) has been acting more and more ridicolous, making threats left and right, since he's able to ban anyone he pleases from playing a game he himself doesn't even play.

uakf.b
Staff Department
Posts: 7829
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: Risk Devolution 2.3b bot hosted by RNG observations

Postby uakf.b » Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:33 am

Any other opinions on this?
dWFrZi5i -- 'cause I'm cool like Agreements

uakf.b
Staff Department
Posts: 7829
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: Risk Devolution 2.3b bot hosted by RNG observations

Postby uakf.b » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:20 pm

Well looks like you updated OP. You should reply instead next time...
dWFrZi5i -- 'cause I'm cool like Agreements


Return to “Suggestion Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests