Hellhalt Td 1v1 bot pls

[mattybatty]

yes i like 1v1 v80 i support that

[iiabos]

Im supportive of a 1 v 1 bot. I do think it should be .84 because of the faster pace as linkz mentioned, but either versions would probably be fine.

[halo_mauler]

I am fine with either version I have noticed its really slow during certain hours
Gamename: [ENT] HELLHALT TD v80 #50
Bot name: ENT.2
Duration: 01:29:39
Map: HELLHALT v5.0.80.w3x
Username Realm Ping ELO W/L
First team (avg: 992.05; change: +15.5/-14.5)
say.three.small entconnect 100 992.1 13/15
Empty
Empty
Second team (avg: 1003.22; change: +14.5/-15.5)
halo_mauler entconnect 27 1003.2 57/50
Empty
Empty

[halo_mauler]

Gamename: [ENT] HELLHALT TD v80 #50
Bot name: ENT.2
Duration: 02:28:55
Map: HELLHALT v5.0.80.w3x
Username Realm Ping ELO W/L
First team (avg: 1000; change: +14.8/-15.2)
Empty
Empty
Empty
Second team (avg: 1003.22; change: +14.8/-15.2)
halo_mauler entconnect 27 1003.2 57/50
Empty
Empty

[Siop]

+1

[Kingsbounty]

both 0.80 and 0.84 great for 1v1. i just hope we have one

[Kingsbounty]

maybe the ent3 bot (.84) could be set to allow starting 1v1

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[Linkin1210]

A separate ranking system for 1v1 would be too much to ask

[Kingsbounty]

A separate ranking system for 1v1 would be too much to ask

yy sure

[Dharck]

yes good

[halo_mauler]

Gamename: [ENT] HELLHALT TD v80 #42
Bot name: ENT.2
Duration: 01:50:58
Map: HELLHALT v5.0.80.w3x
Username Realm Ping ELO W/L
First team (avg: 1143.1; change: +9.1/-20.9)
ChiefSlapaHo entconnect 28 1143.1 3117/3794
Empty
Empty
Second team (avg: 1000; change: +0/-0)
Empty
Empty
Empty

[AdvengerXxX]

Can't wait to see the 1v1 bot coming, especially when sometimes we have to wait over an hour to get a game started.
Players could also refine their builds and tactics in 1v1 games, which is beneficial for 3v3 scenarios too.
This will certainly bring more vibes to the platform.