Mega Ruin from eastybeasty - 1/15

Believe you were banned unfairly? Appeal here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Forum rules
Do not modify the format: Write your information after the brackets and fill in the topic title (subject). For more information, please read here.
User avatar
rules
Forest Walker
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 1:23 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Mega Ruin from eastybeasty - 1/15

Postby rules » Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:09 pm

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 255321.w3g

Despite clear requests to pick a reliable stunner, EastyBeasty deliberately chose to random, drastically lowering the odds of getting a suitable hero for the match’s needs.
This action immediately put the team at a strategic disadvantage from the start.

Item build was inappropriate for Lucifer, remaining unoptimized for over 20 minutes.
Repeatedly went solo without vision or backup, leading to unnecessary deaths — final score: 1 kill, 15 deaths.
gnored multiple pings and direct communication attempts to regroup or play defensively.


(03:07 / Allied) no_rules: get stunner
(03:54 / Allied) eastybeasty: -random
(03:57 / Allied) no_rules: wow
(03:58 / Allied) no_rules: random
(03:59 / Allied) no_rules: gg
(04:04 / Allied) noob_hunter_2: some1 here
(04:04 / Allied) no_rules: !timestamp to watchlist


23:37 / Allied) no_rules: !timestamp check luci items

(28:07 / Allied) no_rules: !timestamp yellow bot

(30:38 / Allied) no_rules: !timestamp yellow farming
(30:42) sLarkypick killed ice.et
(31:14) sLarkypick killed BabySprinkles
(31:23 / All) ice.et: Player [ice.et]'s forfeit vote has been recalled automatically (three minutes have elapsed).

(31:24 / Allied) no_rules: !timestamp feed 0 10

MIKEJONES
ENT Staff
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:32 pm
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: Mega Ruin from eastybeasty - 1/15

Postby MIKEJONES » Sat Jun 21, 2025 1:52 pm

So let me get this straight—everyone knows eastybeasty isn’t exactly a standout player, but you single him out this game just because he picked last? Meanwhile, the higher ELO players on your team get to choose whatever they want, and black.lung ends up being the only one on a carry? That logic’s already flawed.

Now don’t get me wrong, eastybeasty is definitely a good candidate for the watchlist and could benefit from our corrective program to align with gameplay expectations. But this replay? It's not it. Your whole team underperformed against a well-played Bara, and yet you still won. That’s the part people miss.. when Barathrum is played right, the early game is supposed to feel oppressive. It’s meant to break your team’s spirit or force you into making mistakes. That’s what separates mentally strong players from the rest.

Games like this are not ruining. They’re just hard games.

If you genuinely think a player has growth potential or needs review, post it here instead:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=148715

!denied


Return to “Ban Appeals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests