bans
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 12:31 am
Is it possible that the way bans are carried out could be reevaluated? Even when someone's net does fail, a disconnect here and there cant be helped. Things like weather play a part in it, and sometimes you just lose a connection. I am certain I am not the only one who feels this way, and the only people that would disagree probably have some of the best service and have never been disconnected. If my 50/50 Verizon service can d/c with only 1 computer connected, anyone basically can too, and we shouldn't be punished for it. The one argument is likely that some people pp to avoid playing out a game. But for every 1 idiot that would get up, walk to his router, and pull the plug or flip a switch, there are 10 people who have legitimate, unavoidable disconnections. I ask that a better solution at least be looked into. Thank you for your consideration.