Disable afk kick?

[BouncingHitman]

disable afk kick in channel clan ent pls, I enjoy seeing the channel with 6+ users.

[cyberpunk]

Sorry man, I don't think this can be a good idea due to the limit of 40 users/bots.

[nabo.]

As cyber mentioned, there is a limit to how many people a channel can hold.

A channel rarely gets 40 ppl unless flooded by bots usually... So, bouncing's suggestion is also reasonable.

As long as there is room for people to come into ENT channel to use bot commands for its services and people dont spam the channel, I dont see a big problem.

I guess it depends whether u want a semi lively channel with afks or u want a clean channel. Anyway if ppl r afk, wats the point for them staying? May be uakfb can adjust the time of the afk kick.

[BouncingHitman]

The limit doesn't matter, because it will never be filled. I'm here in the channel every day, and as nabo mentioned it only gets full when the channel gets spammed. When AFK kick is on, the channel is literally a ghost town and it looks like an inactive clan. Who cares if people go afk? If it was a problem, I'm pretty sure battle.net would of implemented a system of their own long ago. As to using commands though, /w clan.enterprise is an option.

[jew]

Just lengthen the time before afk kick ezpz better than removing it

[eldryan]

what about making the kick timer set in at 25 users, instead of immediately, to fix this issue.

[uakf.b]

What is the point of having a bunch of AFK users in channel?

[aRt)Y]

What is the point of having a bunch of AFK users in channel?

To create an illusion of activity.

[nabo.]

What is the point of having a bunch of AFK users in channel?

Bouncing's a lonely boy.

[BouncingHitman]

What is the point of having a bunch of AFK users in channel?

Bouncing's a lonely boy.

I need new friends.

But ya.

To create an illusion of activity.

[aRt)Y]

But ya.

To create an illusion of activity.

Therefore, denied.