Ban's

[Profe]

Just a thought on bans cause lately the NWU community has been like a carousel of arguments regarding banning this person or that person. You guys should make it so you can only ban the person if you were in that same game as that person! Cause lately the NWU community has been having people who are banned/ban dodgers try and ban other players for games that were a few weeks back and they themselves were not even in the game.

Plz lemme know your thoughts on this cause im sure the admins are getting tired of seeing this as well

Edit: Honestly if the people in the game really cared that much they would put in a ban request themselves

[TakeNRun]

@Profe You nailed it on the head my friend, too true.

Supported this %100.

[Azog]

Bad idea much ppl dont know how to report or they just lazy , so u saying ppl who use a glith or feed or mh dont should get banned bc ppl from he's game dont report him? yehh pretty bad idea u just say it bc i report masamune

[Profe]

Honestly azog you're just trying to piss me off so go watch replays like you do plz

[Profe]

and are you seriously that big of a pussy to verse our team? plz try to hold the title of champion of the nwu tourney without actually playing some of the best players in this game.......fucking gayzog

[teller55]

Well, the argument against this is, if you break rules, it shouldn't matter if that person is in the game, a rule was broken.

The argument against this is though, if the people in the game didn't care enough to post a Ban Request, they are either too lazy to do so, or it didn't bother them enough to warrant a ban.

Personally, for raging or emotional outbursts, etc., things that someone would report you for, I think you should have to be in that game to post a Ban Request for them. BUT, if it's votekick abuse, map hacking, excessive afk, etc., it doesn't matter whether or not someone was in the game or not, you broke a rule and should be banned for it.

[uakf.b]

No response, archiving.