no cross ltd bot

[iightfyre]

@junzzi

Sorry to offend you by pointing out rule differences, I didn't intend it to come across that way. I was only concerned of how the format would look on the public rule page is all... I want to see it condensed and easy to follow is all. I think we are on the same page now.

I do still disagree with you on a separate ELO bracket for a no cross bot. Maybe I can be swayed by a persuasive argument but as of right now I think its just a lot of LTD ELO brackets; we already have pub, 1v1, lihl. Also, I just assumed that the players would not want to start from scratch in the new ELO bracket - some of the 1200-1300 ELO players have hundreds of games played on that account. I am making an assumption but I figured that the players would want to keep their current stats. I dunno tho. More insight into this is very much welcome.

Cheers

[JunZzi]

@iightfyre

That is a valid point, I never thought of it that way.

Me and Iight have decided the best way to make a decision on either a new Elo Chart, or to Merge with your current Stats, was to make a pole to the public, and to see what they feel is best for them.

[iightfyre]

Poll created:

https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=24727

[BeepBoopBeep]

Can we finalize this?

[JunZzi]

@iightfyre @beepboopbeep

Seems the poll went in the favour of a new ELO Bracket.

Last discussion is if we should have an ELO Requirment?

[BeepBoopBeep]

1100 why not

[JunZzi]

Im in favour of 1100.

@iightfyre @supersexyy

[nabo.]

No cross bot would b nice. I personally think crossing takes away a lot of the required skill n positioning. I enjoy solo building, but there r many times when im forced to cross just because i know the other team will cross or double cross...

1100-1200 seems reasonable elo restriction.

[BeepBoopBeep]

@uakf.b plz

[matdas]

Why limit the player base? I enjoy a game of no cross. But, unlike most people, i wipe my stats. So am I unable to play just because of that? If there is a separate elo bracket, then no requirement. Otherwise it will just be another waste.

For example: Why should i be penalized (by not being allowed to play, for having a 1000 elo constantly due to resetting every 15 games) to play a game of legion with no cross or double build?

And for the record, i will not retain any elo just to play on a bot. Elo ruins the game, therefore, i will reset my stats every 15 games.

[BeepBoopBeep]

If there is a separate elo bracket, then no requirement.

This

[supersexyy]

It would get rid of boosting for the most part. Isn't the whole point of a seperate ELO bracket to make ELO mean something?

[BeepBoopBeep]

Poll is 13-8 for new elo bracket

[JunZzi]

@iightfyre

Please way in on this.


No Requirement / Requirement.


Im in vote of no requirement, We cant avoid boosting, it will happen any ways, All someone has to do is get to 1100 elo on one of the other bots, than they are 1000 again if there is a new ELO Bracket.

[Diablo_]

No requirement if own ELO bracket sounds fine.