a hypothetical situation

[seacow]

Saving the game should be disabled, there is no need for it.

-Burn

irrelevant to the topic, i could wrote another topic but arty is gona get upset and move that topic away

[Burn]

Wut, topic question is already answered. It's still going to be ban-able for 3 days for intentional suicide or game ruining, but I didn't feel the need to make a new topic just for save abuse since it doesn't occur that frequently, and it'll just mean more coding.

-Burn

[seacow]

more pertaining to this topic
do you know about the spirit and letter of the rule?
by letter of rule, the course of action mention in main topic did not infringe any rule. but point argue, here by most people recognize the rule intention is to prevent the death of the minion, that is the "spirit".
if you understand this "spirit" or intention of the rule, which i argue for saving game . if the intention of saving of game is to disrupt, although lasting mere few second,thereby "intention abusing", ban him by all mean
however if someone innocently save the game just to save the game, he is not guilty at all, for he did not intend to disrupt the game state.
Arty either lack the capacity to understand this or choose to disregard it and ban any player who save in game.
[spoiler=]even when the rule specify "intentionally abuse"[/spoiler]

[Burn]

I think issuing a ban for saving or pausing a game in the middle of a siege, gank or TP is entirely justified, as it is, abusing the pause/save function to intentionally ruin gameplay.

Maybe if ENT had a 3s delay with countdown before pause is issued, and/or 3s delay after the pause with countdown to make it less abusable.

I don't know when Art)y has banned just for randomly pausing without reason but I think I heard about it. Mind providing evidence of this?

-Burn

[Yondaime]

This hypothetical suggestion is now being archived, no matter how you say it seacow it is considered suicide.