EdgeOfChaos, Larz Wrongful ban Dota

[intersmack]

Gonzo ask me to post because he's been banned from forum.

EdgeOfChaos and Larz have both stated this matter can be continued in the complaint section of the forum.
Refence: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=100769


gonzoindahouse@uswest has been banned for 2 weeks for essentially playing suicide techies and "repeated gamethrowing" by EdgeOfChaos in the following post: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=100674

Larz stands by the ban claiming suicide techie is not a strat and he was intentionally trolling.



First point is the 2 weeks by EdgeOfChaos who claims gonzo has ruined 4 games which means "repeated gamethrowing"
gonzoindahouse@uswest has played 4,063 games in total.

4 games ruined out of 4,063.

4/4063 x 100 = 0.098%

This means on average gonzo could play 1,015 games before he ruins one and EdgeOfChaos considers this "repeated gamethrowing" and issues a two week ban.


Larz does not mention all the stasis traps planted or wards techie buys for team. Now I'll add 4 replays for Larz claiming suicide techie is not a strat.

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 403593.w3g
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 461477.w3g
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 422279.w3g

You don't need to watch every game just look at the score/who wins.


Now as for the actual game where techies and bara blame each other. Techies even bought wards so bara could charge.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=100791

Beerlord watched the game (focused on bara) but still said in the topic "I see no evidence for game ruin or failure to defend."


This proves wrongful ban.

[aRt)Y]

The amount of games is trivial to casual bans. The same rules apply to anyone, regardless of the amount of games. We dont treat anyone as VIP because he managed to play x k games without violating rules. So that argument is invalid.

The second one claims the moderators/larz dont acknowledge the technie strategy. That seems wrong, too.
I will quote him:

I said the strat i would not ban for but when thats all you do the entire game its a different story.
-https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=100769#p398266

The user's ban history nor his forum posting history are in his favor - so it isnt surprising he got banned from the forum. However, I will give him the following deal:
* forum unban tomorrow evening
* he may re-appeal in 1 week (starting from the day his ban got enforced)

He should quit his trolling, spamming, capsing and flaming though or his chance of getting his appeal approved are zero.
I dont see a problem if he posts in the same manner as you do @intersmack

[aRt)Y]

Considering today's posts (viewtopic.php?f=25&t=100783), you can consider the deal as invalid.