Ban Appeal

Looking for your appeal? Approved or denied appeals are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

MoLoCEL
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:33 am

Ban Appeal

Postby MoLoCEL » Tue Mar 13, 2018 3:37 am

Your Warcraft III username: MoLoCEL
Realm/Gateway: Europe
Why are you banned: Votekick (thread: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=125313&p=486656&hilit=molocel#p486656)
Why you should be unbanned: Because this doesn't look like a banable reason to me. User DingShangWangSa flamed all game and was toxic, nevertheless we lived with it, but couldn't when he decided to TK and not send 7. I sent, green couldn't send anything, and pink did not up king or send. Ban duration is small, but it seems a bit farfetched to ban 5 players when the actual one that was the offender asked for it. I have informed of the reason for the votekick, which was TKing.

User avatar
osug
Treant
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 9:47 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Ban Appeal

Postby osug » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:44 am

Hello MoLoCEL,

I'll try to explain this ban to you.

He couldn't know about the send on 7 because you ignored him.
(00:00 / Allied) MoLoCEL: !ignore ding
[...]
(00:00 / Allied) MoLoCEL: send


Afterwards you votekicked him for the pure intention of !ff
(00:00 / All) MoLoCEL: kick and we ff
[...]
(00:00 / Allied) MoLoCEL: kick him first


The reason was therefore not TK. If you had give reasons like Flaming, things might be different tho.
Do not kiss the girl who has a cold.

MoLoCEL
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:33 am

Re: Ban Appeal

Postby MoLoCEL » Tue Mar 13, 2018 11:44 am

He actually did know. I called the 7 send right before lvl 4 started after oj left, before i ignored him and pinged the map when i sent on 7.

(00:00 / Allied) MoLoCEL: go 7

Even more, he refused to up king when we leaked bad.

User avatar
osug
Treant
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 9:47 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Ban Appeal

Postby osug » Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:24 pm

LTD is very dynamic. In addition I see only you calling for 7 send.

(00:00 / Allied) MoLoCEL: kick him first
mind to explain why you needed to kick before ff?
Do not kiss the girl who has a cold.

MoLoCEL
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:33 am

Re: Ban Appeal

Postby MoLoCEL » Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:38 pm

So, firstly oj had already left and green didn't have any realistic wood so couldn't really send anything, so it was only down to me and pink to send. I sent, pink didn't and didn't up king. Game was lost anyway, after he TKed we would have ff anyway it wasn't a condition to ff, but more to tell the other team that we don't intend to go further even if they kick or not. The vote kick was for TKing.

User avatar
osug
Treant
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 9:47 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Ban Appeal

Postby osug » Tue Mar 13, 2018 1:14 pm

If Green had lumber or not doesn't matter. Even without lumber he can vote whether the team sends or not.
There was no clear call for send.

You made it to a condition to kick him for ff. (I quoted that already. If your intention was to votekick for tk than there would've been no need to point out that you !ff if the other team votekick him.)
Please take your time and overthink that game.
Denied.
Do not kiss the girl who has a cold.


Return to “Processed Appeals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests