opinion difference cannot be considered as GAME RUINING

Looking for your appeal? Approved or denied appeals are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

mianmianhae
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 11:34 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: opinion difference cannot be considered as GAME RUINING

Postby mianmianhae » Tue May 17, 2016 4:33 pm

mining on creep was NOT "maliciously using spells"

This is called "Turn Over" just like "Normandy Invasion"

mianmianhae
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 11:34 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: opinion difference cannot be considered as GAME RUINING

Postby mianmianhae » Tue May 17, 2016 4:35 pm

Are you the support of Nazism?

And then I feel so sry

wewoneno
Basic Tree
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 1:50 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: opinion difference cannot be considered as GAME RUINING

Postby wewoneno » Tue May 17, 2016 4:38 pm

Nobody is saying that mining neutral camps are against the rules, that's a straw man.

You put one mine in each camp with the intent to permanently prevent the next spawns from happening.

Whether or not it had a negative or positive effect on the outcome of this particular game is irrelevant.

However, it is immensely more likely that doing this in any game at any point will have a negative outcome rather than a positive one.

JupiterRetrograde69
Aura Tree
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 12:54 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: opinion difference cannot be considered as GAME RUINING

Postby JupiterRetrograde69 » Tue May 17, 2016 5:06 pm

Agreed. Difference in opinions cannot be considered as game ruining, as it undermines the players' entitlement/right to free will.

In a competitive gaming settings, players would usually not assume otherwise, but I wouldn't bother if I were you.

As evidenced by Beerlord and others, ent-gaming heavily favors the ban requests rather than fair judgements, creating a culture where players are constantly threatening other players to make ban requests almost every game.

I would only assume that this is because ent-gaming wants people to visit their websites. Otherwise I just don't see how such culture benefits ent-gaming.

Either way, ent-gaming does not practice justice nor democracy, unfortunately.

And as a result, if Ent-gaming wishes to lose its popularity in the gaming world, let them.

As dota players are well aware, you can't always convince people to do what's in their best interest.

So yeah.. I wouldn't bother reasoning with ent-gaming if I were you

User avatar
Burnt
Treant Protector
Posts: 672
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 6:59 pm
Location: Toronto, CA
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: opinion difference cannot be considered as GAME RUINING

Postby Burnt » Tue May 17, 2016 5:24 pm

mianmianhae wrote:You are just very annoying to answer

And you are not listening at all

oyu yes.

He answered your question but you missed it in your own wall of spam. You maliciously used spells and you won't get unbanned unless you admit it. The consequence of the game doesn't matter when it comes to ban decisions, your action does.
GOTEM

BeerLord
Protector of Nature
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: opinion difference cannot be considered as GAME RUINING

Postby BeerLord » Tue May 17, 2016 5:28 pm

@mianmianhae
The point of my banning you was my presumption that you were game ruining, but you have stated your case effectively that this is not so. Thanks for coming to discuss this.
Unbanned.


Return to “Processed Appeals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests