Th3-Re4per

Looking for your appeal? Approved or denied appeals are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

re4per
Resource Storage
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:59 am

Th3-Re4per

Postby re4per » Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:35 pm

Warcraft III username: Th3-Re4per
Realm: Azeroth (East)
Gamename: N/A
Bot username: N/A
Situation: Banned for ip dodge MH under username pokeroff.ghost by admin adventure club, I do not have this account. Talked to art)y he looked into it, agreed I don't use those ip's but there's nothing he can do at the moment.
Why you should be unbanned: no reason to be banned.

Thank you.

Image

re4per
Resource Storage
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:59 am

Re: Th3-Re4per

Postby re4per » Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:55 pm

Just look into it please. It started this morning where I began not beeing able to join.
Art)y said it was a diff admin (not adventureclub) who added my ban. So I think something fishy is going on.

User avatar
iCoNNecT
Treant Protector
Posts: 598
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 1:12 am
Location: California

Re: Th3-Re4per

Postby iCoNNecT » Thu Jul 04, 2013 2:46 am

It doesn't say ban either. Nor in ban history
https://entgaming.net/openstats/?bans=& ... Th3-Re4per
Idk what's with this ban.

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Th3-Re4per

Postby aRt)Y » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:44 am

Agreements wrote:Certainly took you time to come here appealing it.

And you certainly haven't taken the time to check his case.

As he mentioned, I've already looked into his case and since I couldn't resolve it, it's up to the reds to do something.
Since he played just fine the days ago, something must have happened..

Reaper's IPs don't match with the banned guy, neither are they in range.
Reaper doesn't have any alts and his IP range is also different.

I'll put him on econnect until we received clarification.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Th3-Re4per

Postby aRt)Y » Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:57 am

Agreements wrote:Art)Y why should it be a red admin, and not yourself?

Because it seems that a normal mod can't solve his current issue. Simply unbanning him won't help him.

So the reds might figure out why the bans are wrong in already 2 cases.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

re4per
Resource Storage
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:59 am

Re: Th3-Re4per

Postby re4per » Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:02 pm

resolved. Thankyou.

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Th3-Re4per

Postby aRt)Y » Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:56 pm

Removing from econnect.

Resolved.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “Processed Appeals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests