Page 1 of 1

[DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:14 pm
by silic
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=7851704
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #26
Your Warcraft III Username: jabala
Violator's Warcraft III Username: wrong_way
Violated Rule(s): I up chikins,then he forbade me to control her.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts:

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:20 pm
by Jabba41
@silic when did this happen?

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:22 pm
by silic
when I told him that he was wrong in choosing a hero, because in my just me and him were good players in the team and that Kerry should not get them from among

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:39 pm
by getstomped
@silic jabba is asking for a specific Time in the game.

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 10:25 pm
by dotaworx1
ctrl-F in the search log produced:
"pick"
(20:11 / Allied) Jabala: you pick zeus
(20:13 / Allied) Wrong_Way: sence none of u got 1 single dust
(20:13 / Allied) Jabala: total fail
(20:17 / Allied) Wrong_Way: hahaha
(20:17 / Allied) grAS: and shit bh come from noehwere
(20:22 / Allied) Wrong_Way: yes yes
(20:24 / Allied) Wrong_Way: all my fault

"unshare"
(22:46 / Allied) Jabala: zeus unshare if i up chikins you take ban ;)

Conclude: between 20:11-22:46

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 12:21 am
by silic
here I am wrong but anyway he could not read the mail cost me ignore.And do not read one sentence out of context give it nice what I said (20:45 / Allied) Wrong_Way: !ignore jabal
(20:48 / Allied) Wrong_Way: !sd jabal
that's the time when you ignore me so that he could not see what I was writing it so it what you took out of context has nothing to do with the brain
;)
THIS IS FULL


(20:04 / Allied) Wrong_Way: its over
(20:08 / Allied) Jweston: no
(20:11 / Allied) Jabala: you pick zeus
(20:13 / Allied) Wrong_Way: sence none of u got 1 single dust
(20:13 / Allied) Jabala: total fail
(20:17 / Allied) Wrong_Way: hahaha
(20:17 / Allied) grAS: and shit bh come from noehwere
(20:22 / Allied) Wrong_Way: yes yes
(20:24 / Allied) Wrong_Way: all my fault
(20:25 / Allied) Jweston: i trACK
(20:31 / Allied) grAS: why b
(20:33 / Allied) Jabala: here just me and you and
(20:33 / Allied) grAS: we was all
(20:35 / Allied) Jabala: you pick
(20:35 / Allied) Jabala: zeus
(20:38 / Allied) Jabala: useles
(20:41 / Allied) lugia: go
(20:42 / Allied) grAS: go gank
(20:43 / Allied) Vengel: def
(20:45 / Allied) grAS: stupoid blue
(20:45 / Allied) Wrong_Way: !ignore jabal
(20:48 / Allied) Wrong_Way: !sd jabal

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 3:24 am
by FatherTomahawk
This ban seems pretty petty to me from chat log.
(09:34 / Allied) Jabala: retard
(11:12 / Allied) Jabala: retard
(12:39 / All) Jabala: retard
(15:06 / Allied) Jabala: oke Im wood all time from now
(16:17 / Allied) Jabala: never sheild on me
(16:19 / Allied) Jabala: fucking
(16:20 / Allied) Jabala: retard
(17:40 / Allied) Jabala: retard
(17:43 / Allied) Jabala: come one time on time
(17:44 / Allied) Jabala: retard
(17:56 / Allied) Jabala: shit
(18:00 / Allied) Jabala: useles
(18:02 / Allied) Jabala: shit
(18:48 / Allied) Jabala: useles
(18:49 / Allied) Jabala: team

after all this he...
(21:49 / Allied) Jabala: !ff

then he wants to ban someone for unshareing courier. didn't watch game replay but chat log seems more than enough to see that this is just a spiteful post on a teammate in a game that was lost

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:27 am
by raedric
Yes but if he actually did unshare courier after ally shared (without the ally griefing hero control or courier) is still in violation of the rules. He could have just ignored the other player.

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 5:21 am
by FatherTomahawk
@raedric
(20:45 / Allied) Wrong_Way: !ignore jabal
(21:49 / Allied) Jabala: !ff

He did ignore him, but I think you're missing my point. This ban is petty. Jabala degrades team entire game and then calls out ban on someone who was clearly fed up with him. If you look in chat you will see more than one teammate had enough of him. Rules are in place for people that don't care about good games or fair gameplay. The fact that you can't see the irony and pettiness in this ban and yet you recently applied for mod is very unsettling.
" I've played dota since it's inception so I'd like to believe I have a pretty discerning eye for the game." You said this bro. This is a petty ban and everyone who has played dota knows it.

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:19 am
by killerbladeaex
It doesnt matter if he spams or flames the other player ignored him , rules are rules he broke the rule by unsharing and i dont care if you are unsettled or not the guy who applied for mod is right and you are wrong that guy who unshared deserves a ban @fathertomahawk

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:03 pm
by silic
worries me how to play and when they are doing in the end I picked up a chicken so I have the right to use it and place!

Re: [DOTA] for ban]

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:15 pm
by BeerLord
I agree with raedric here, this is clearly a violation of a rule. The pettiness of, and or, a teams annoyance with, are not relevant in this case.
wrong_way banned one day for unsharing courier.