Page 1 of 1
[ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:46 am
by Eloquence
Replay Link:
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 603557.w3gGame Name: [ENT] Island Defense #80
Your Warcraft III Username: Jared
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Poraft
Violated Rule(s): Intentionally Blocking
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): ~ 17:00
Any further thoughts: Intentionally blocking as I am trying to wall walk away and dodge nuke. Even admits to it as he says the game is almost over. Also told me to write this.
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:24 am
by twirlify
Can confirm. Nuked the bitch myself.
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:35 am
by pep
Can confirm blocked him myself, I did it cuz game was over and titan left :^) pls ban till friday.
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:00 am
by FollowingPath
If by "game was over" you mean that ELO had already been distributed to the builders since the original titan left, then sure. But there are actually people who play the game for the sake of playing it.
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:34 am
by Hash
!support, this porfat guy is big time blocker!!!
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:30 pm
by juKING
Are you all making a mockery of the rules here at ENTGAMING ? Ban them all
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:43 pm
by pep
@FollowingPath By game was over I mean titan had 0 chance of winning, he was stalling even, thats why the first titan left and ELO was already distributed.
Btw I know what I did is bannable but I simply didn't care, I expected Jared to be able to take a joke.
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 2:16 am
by Stealer
Can we really ban poraft though?
He says he knew what he was doing but can we accept that? The squirrel knows he is gathering acorns but does he know why? Is the squirrel truly concensious of the decision making process behind the acquestion of the acorns? Nay.
For the squirrel is just a creature of a simple mind and does not truly understand what he is doing. Poraft is a similar beast and does not truly understand why he blocked Jared. We cannot punish a squirrel for "intentionally" acorn gathering as the squirrel has no control. Therefore we cannot punish poraft for "intentionally" blocking.
I urge you high
@av1on to dismiss this case with prejudice as for anything else would be I dare say a mockery of justice.
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 2:30 am
by Eloquence
lmao poraft = animal
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 2:31 am
by pep
Very solid point stealer, thanks for your support.
@Eloquence humans are animals just so you know, you might impress the biology teacher with this knowledge))
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 2:35 am
by Eloquence
you're euro = animal ? ?? ? ? ?
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 2:36 am
by RadiantCrystal
locked until review
Re: [ID] Poraft@useast
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 3:03 am
by Merex
As much as I love squirrels and acorns...
Poraft@useast.battle.net banned 2 days for Teamkill. (Blocking to get a builder killed)