ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 736935.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #36
Your Warcraft III Username: traxexgirl
Violator's Warcraft III Username: mandrak ( Game ruiner )
Violated Rule(s): Gameruiner for mandrak - for other , don't accept kick the game ruiner
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 11'41 - 17'05 -
Any further thoughts: i request ban for don't votekick !yes for gameruiner

Requesban for : hat - Rimbaud - Everythreemonth - doktore - handsoffmyjunk


I warned on several occasions that do not kick Slark for game ruin, was banable they préfré Slark overkill and take gold + level, despite my insistence to 11 minutes for their saying it was a violation of the rules of ENT server, they never wanted to kick Slark.

I stipulate that it should be accountable to the forum admin nabo bomb or other and told me Everythreemonth 27 'that was his NABO friends, and therefore believes that the rules of the above server. I ask reset ELO and ban.

Will review this later tonight.

Edit:

@Jabba41 Sure you can do it now I will be back later to review/confirm.

Regarding the game ruining:
-> it looks like he is a new player (needed much time to pick skills)
-> he was playing bad, but it doesnt look intentional
-> he always tried to avoid beeing killed after he got attacked (later i cant really see it as he dies so fast)
-> sometimes it looked intentional as he was running straight towards the enemies and died.
--> All in all i would say he's just a new player and didnt do that intentional.

17:05 / Allied) xlepa_AOE: !votekick man
(17:09 / Allied) TraxexGirl: !yes
(17:09 / Allied) mandrak: !yes [Well.... he supported his own VK]
(17:12 / Allied) handsoffmyjunk: !yes
(17:14 / Allied) hat: !yes
(17:18 / Allied) Rimbaud: !yes
(17:22 / All) Everythreemonth: !yes
(17:35 / All) TraxexGirl: info chat request again 14 minute game votekick gameruiner violation rule
(18:04 / All) slenderwang: A votekick against player [mandrak] has expired.

-> Last votekick against mandrak after two which failed (but it's legit they didnt voted at that time, no one voted for the first and they didnt gave information for the second)
-> It's not possible to tell if he was intentional feeding or not especially for the enemies. And they other team didnt gave much information about him, they just bitched about the refuse of votekicking him itself.
-> refusing to votekick ✖


This ban request should be denied. (In case mandrak got a ban for game ruining in the past he might deserve a ban)

EDIT:

My opinion: Traxexgirl should be banned for abusing ban and wasting everyone's time here for posting this thread.

IMO votekicking him would be legit as he didnt cooperate (via chat)/playing bad and refusing to votekicking him too. In that case there would have had to be consense of the players ingame.
And people dont get banned here for posting a banrequest, doesnt matter if it will get denied or approved.

it's easy after having used its Feed to say: Oh now you can kick, when all are finished because you have been able to purchase items that do little to afford and thus continue a balanced legitimately part

Slark tried all game, just got schooled by Techies for most of the game. Since there was no intentional feeding or game ruining (Slark just had a bad game), no bans will be issued here.

Please remember you may not kick players for having a bad game.. the !votekick command is only used for those game ruining on purpose.