ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 693704.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] HELLHALT TD #31
Your Warcraft III Username: Beamy
Violator's Warcraft III Username: emps and rm07theis
Violated Rule(s):

rm07theis: Teamkill Rage and Trolling
emps: Teamkill with Rage


Time of Violation (in-game or replay):

(34:27 / Allied) Rm07theis: 17?
(34:33 / Allied) Beamy: u got mutants
(34:34 / Allied) Beamy: right?
(34:34 / Allied) Rm07theis: didn't look like they had much for it
(34:36 / Allied) Rm07theis: ye
(34:42 / Allied) Beamy: ye goin down for 17
(34:46 / Allied) Beamy: im getting hero for 17 as well
(34:50 / Allied) Beamy: i got regen + mutant
(34:54 / Allied) Beamy: inferno can't kill me

(38:45 / Allied) Beamy: my rage is gonna a little but late
(38:58 / Allied) Rm07theis: oh fuck i forgot i had to up mutants and savef or rage..
(38:59 / Allied) Rm07theis: :s
(39:19 / Allied) Beamy: oh
(39:20 / Allied) Beamy: no need to rage
(39:21 / Allied) Beamy: juice it

(Both players pop rage after the enemy team raged)

(40:25 / Allied) Beamy: u guys..
(40:27 / Allied) Beamy: didnt need to rage
(40:28 / Allied) Beamy: ...


(40:57 / All) Beamy: i told them not to rage
(41:00 / All) Beamy: and still do it
(41:08 / All) Rm07theis: yea he told us after we all leaked xD

(41:22 / Allied) Beamy: what
(41:23 / Allied) Beamy: no
(41:25 / Allied) Beamy: i literally said
(41:26 / Allied) Beamy: dont rage
(41:43 / Allied) Beamy: whatever
(41:45 / Allied) Beamy: reporting anyways
(41:47 / Allied) Rm07theis: no lol
(41:48 / Allied) Rm07theis: xD


Any further thoughts: I told them before hands not to rage for 17 at (39:20). Knowing the facts that we didn't have upper hand versus siege/fort golems. No further thoughts about this. Thank you for reviewing.

This looks like more of an overconfident rage than an intentional team kill rage. You all had 2 people with mutants on 17, that usually means you can rage. You really think this guy raged with the intent to lose the game for his team? Because that's the reason people should be banned, not for disagreeing with you about whether or not to rage when you have mutants on 17. Just my opinion. Lots of people intentionally ruining games, so I'd hate to see someone get banned just for mistakenly thinking they could hold and being wrong about it.

Mistakes happen. This doesn't seem intentional at all. Denied