[DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 6:31 pm
[DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
Your Warcraft III username: DeepMoisture
Violator's Warcraft III username: SuperSane @ useast.battle.net
Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA LoD -sdems6bod2 #98
Stats page link: http://atl.entgaming.net/replay/view_re ... 847489.w3g
Rule player violated: MapHack
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): Minute 8 - has no sight of us roshing whatsoever, has no wards, and yet lingers around trying to gain sight (but does not), then circles around and goes to "check" rune prior to ganking us at Rosh when were are both at extremely low hp and rosh is almost dead. I don't see how he could possibly time it any better - he didn't even have treads, so I don't see "he was going to go Rosh at that exact moment in time" like a viable excuse, given how he waited prior to ganking us at Rosh for a good half a minute.
Any further thoughts: Thanks for reviewing, and ban please.
Violator's Warcraft III username: SuperSane @ useast.battle.net
Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA LoD -sdems6bod2 #98
Stats page link: http://atl.entgaming.net/replay/view_re ... 847489.w3g
Rule player violated: MapHack
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): Minute 8 - has no sight of us roshing whatsoever, has no wards, and yet lingers around trying to gain sight (but does not), then circles around and goes to "check" rune prior to ganking us at Rosh when were are both at extremely low hp and rosh is almost dead. I don't see how he could possibly time it any better - he didn't even have treads, so I don't see "he was going to go Rosh at that exact moment in time" like a viable excuse, given how he waited prior to ganking us at Rosh for a good half a minute.
Any further thoughts: Thanks for reviewing, and ban please.
- VirusHunter
- Corrupted Treant
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:52 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
pretty sure ive seen this name banned before for maphacking. but not sure if it was proven or not.

-auctoritas non veritas facit legem-
- Yondaime
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:13 am
- Location: Canada EH?
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=5802 on west he was banned for maphacking but he now has an east account. So this could be him as well.
My problem is the only suspicious play is when he kills you at rosh really.
I did a quick run-through picked up no clicks from him, and so i did a regular run, other than that the play isnt that too well suspicious.
My problem is the only suspicious play is when he kills you at rosh really.
I did a quick run-through picked up no clicks from him, and so i did a regular run, other than that the play isnt that too well suspicious.

-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 6:31 pm
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
I don't have a problem with thinking he MHs, given the exact circumstance of HOW he killed me at Rosh. Just look at his game-play. He literally sits there waiting for Rosh to get low without wards, and comes at us at the exact right moment. You tell me how a non-maphacking player can do that so well, and I'll let it go. If you're unsure, ask another admin to review the moment in question. Not to mention clearly the other account with the same name was banned for MH; why would anyone else mimic his name? Remember hungsolow? He LOVED making accounts with the same/similar name, even though he had like 30 active bans.
- VirusHunter
- Corrupted Treant
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:52 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
but banning someone doesnt just ban their name. it bans their IP. so if it IS the same player you should check his IP's but most likely he is ban dodging.

-auctoritas non veritas facit legem-
- Yondaime
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:13 am
- Location: Canada EH?
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
kaisereo Maphacking : http://clanent.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=5802 2013-03-11 00:00:00 6 Mar 2014 13:00:50 AST Expired So what is up with this though, theoretically this guy should still be banned as it is not 2014 yet last time I checked.
@Agreements
@Agreements

- VirusHunter
- Corrupted Treant
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:52 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
but why would he unban a proven maphacker?

-auctoritas non veritas facit legem-
- Yondaime
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:13 am
- Location: Canada EH?
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
if this is known not to be a mistake @agreements are you able to do the banning then as it was earlier confirmed?? I do not entirely have full access to WC3 at all as I am on my vaca.

-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 6:31 pm
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
So you've got admins potentially un-banning maphackers? LOL I should just stop reporting entirely then =D
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
I remember that game.
The one where I went to check Roshan since many enemies were missing from minimap.
Thanks for the compliment in assuming that I am either incredibly good or that it is maphack.
I appreciate your compliment and poor reasoning as much as I did the previous ban attempt.
In the link below VirusHunter is apologizing for his ignorance in his misuse of the fog detector.
Apology accepted VirusHunter. Stop the spurious accusations and implications. Its annoying.
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6012&p=26733&hilit=supersane#p26733
The one where I went to check Roshan since many enemies were missing from minimap.
Thanks for the compliment in assuming that I am either incredibly good or that it is maphack.
I appreciate your compliment and poor reasoning as much as I did the previous ban attempt.
In the link below VirusHunter is apologizing for his ignorance in his misuse of the fog detector.
Apology accepted VirusHunter. Stop the spurious accusations and implications. Its annoying.
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6012&p=26733&hilit=supersane#p26733
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 6:31 pm
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
Yet still does not explain your actual behavior at said time. You did not GO to check, you waited right behind Roshan in woods by mid, waited, and waited, and waited... then you went to rune, waited, and then you went and stormbolted the two of us when we were both at low hp and Roshan was almost dead. You have also been accused of MH more than once... go figure. I repeat to admins: how does one do that without MH? Just watch the replay for yourself guys - his behavior is super suspicious.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 6:31 pm
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
"The one where I went to check Roshan since many enemies were missing from minimap."
What you say is false. Teamlor (Phoenix) was killed recently, so it's unlikely/impossible he rushed to Rosh. Fulafula (Pugna) and Goops.finest (Wisp) were both pushing mid, and Pugna was killed, so Wisp backed. He clearly did not go to Rosh. I had forested for most of that game, and Naix didn't appear on the map very often at all... so all of a sudden you assume we're Roshing and decide to check? If I were you, and I saw the enemy team lose two players and another back, I wouldn't presume that Legion/Naix were Roshing, but rather I'd think they were foresting and go gank there. But you don't even veer to the forest, and instead gank us at low hp at that exact time. You're not good. You just cheat.
What you say is false. Teamlor (Phoenix) was killed recently, so it's unlikely/impossible he rushed to Rosh. Fulafula (Pugna) and Goops.finest (Wisp) were both pushing mid, and Pugna was killed, so Wisp backed. He clearly did not go to Rosh. I had forested for most of that game, and Naix didn't appear on the map very often at all... so all of a sudden you assume we're Roshing and decide to check? If I were you, and I saw the enemy team lose two players and another back, I wouldn't presume that Legion/Naix were Roshing, but rather I'd think they were foresting and go gank there. But you don't even veer to the forest, and instead gank us at low hp at that exact time. You're not good. You just cheat.
Re: [DOTA] SuperSane @ useast.battle.net MH
In essence, there is no evidence of maphacking, just bullshit accusations.
Use a fog detector and see.
And ENT (iirc) does not ban based on spurious accusations (which is 99% of what you have typed).
End of thread.
Use a fog detector and see.
And ENT (iirc) does not ban based on spurious accusations (which is 99% of what you have typed).
End of thread.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests