ENT Gaming

Replay Link: see below
Game Name: see below
Your Warcraft III Username:
Violator's Warcraft III Username: faqqot@europe.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): game ruining
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts: I originally stated it in this BRQ:
viewtopic.php?p=523625#p523625

It seems to have been forgotten in the original brq, that this guy was involved in this game ruining scheme together with humanchair/morelossthanwin.

Just to make sure, you're referring to this game alone, correct, @Augustinus ?

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 363360.w3g

He might be referring to the games we scouted of faqqot with humanchair (with and against), but u'll need some replays and timestamps to prove your point (that humanchair was throwing while against faqqot, and played normally/followed "advices" while teaming with him)

I have problems with replays at the moment - they seem to be broken after a minute. Here is what I gathered so far (Copied from an older post regarding this):

Example 1: Here he proves that he is capable of playing perfectly well. He has very good knowledge of strategies, builds, units and ltd slang.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11332700

Example 2: again, nice game
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11360562

Example 3: nice set up for merging, perfect communication with the team
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11363795


Now lets take a look at some other games, where he did not perform so well. One is already shown in his original ban request. How can this be? Someone who with the skills of those games above builds zombie + 2 trash ads in the middle of the lane for a start?

Example 3: Same situation as in my game. Cross was denied to him, he went for full tk build in the middle of the lane.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11338187

Example 4: Again: He suggests crossand goes for a super teamkilling build when that did not work out:
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11360782

Example 6: Here he actually goes for crossing as a holder like he always suggests, but he does it in a way that just has to end in a disaster by placing the yggdrasil on the left side - every experienced ltdler will already know what is gonna happen. Not that he got much left to ruin, given his teammates, who are truely new players.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11363667

The explanation behind these cases is that he plays perfectly well when he is in the same team with faqqot and ruining games when he is in a different team. He does it not only when playing without friends to lower his elo, but - and that I think is why faqqot should be banned too - when playing in the enemy team of faqqot.

So I think faqqot should be banned for letting his friend destroy his enemy teams in order to gain easier wins/gaining more elo when humanchair was lower again.

ps.: I know that for formalistic reasons he is not the one teamkilling but only his friend - however he was the partner of this scheme and the profiteur. Everyone can judge this for himself.

Violated Rule(s): game ruining

He dindt ruin the game, u need to report the other one and not him.
Faqqot played like he always does. he don't need someone to tk other team

W0nderland wrote:

Violated Rule(s): game ruining

He dindt ruin the game, u need to report the other one and not him.
Faqqot played like he always does. he don't need someone to tk other team

Except morelossthanwin aka humanchair lost games in order to lower his elo, and then played with faqqot and won - I'd call that stats boosting, but that's me (No one would expect you to go against ur mates, but at least, i'd stay out of it, instead of blindly support them, when they were caught )

Ok given we might need some timestamps/replays for this (which is not hard - just needs time), i ask you not to lock/process this yet - i'll start doing it and will edit/post it once i'm done, ty

So let's start with the obvious:

[*]Morelossthanwin/adwords_editor skill lvl:

Example 1 - https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11389733

->Starts with 3 sprites (calling suicide)
->Pushes during 2 (while sending furb, and discussing sends with team)
->Builds on 3 (while calling the send for 5)

Stopping at 4 - He had 5 sprites, 7/1 push, discussing sends/builds with allies

Example 2 - https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11389620

-> Starts nm on 1 (discussing plan with team - who was gonna suicide, etc.)
-> Calls send on 2
-> Builds 2nd nm on 3 (with parasite, asking team to resend again)

Stopping at 5 - He was 4/0 (due to blue suiciding and he was building to catch his leaks on merge), yet discussed plans, sends, etc.

So after 2 games, it's enough to know morelossthanwin/adwords_editor/humanchair is a skilled player (has ltd knowdledge, communicates, discusses sends, etc.)

Now let's move on to what we're actually after:

[*]Games with faqqot:

Example 1 (with faqqot) - https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11332700

->Starts with 5 ogres, 2/0 (asking if he was suiciding, or catching)

(cant watch more past this, due to replay being broken for some odd reason - yet he won with faqqot and according to chat, they communicated, etc.)

Example 2 (with faqqot): https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11361227

-> Starts with 5 ogres (building wisps as well): Team says he should have build goblin alc, he claims i dind't know, but i'm almost sure he built the ogres to suicide and let yellow/faqqot catch the leaks (given they built on opposite sides, making it easier for yellow to catch his leaks)
->Doens't build on 2, but yellow ob's for 2 (with grizz, mudman and dark mage), further proving my point from 1
->On 3 he delays the lane only, perfectly knowing what he wanted to do right from the start (Note: they never spoke on chat for these rounds, yet knew exactly what to do)

Stopping here - While faqqot lost this one, humanchair built and played with him perfectly well, without a single problem

Example 3 (against faqqot) - https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11363360

-> starts with zombie in midlane (+2 geomancers and 1 spectre)
->upgrades spec for 2
->upgrades spec a 2nd time on 3 (while staying 1/0)

Stopping here - He was 1/1 on 5, with 2 zombies, 2 geos, 1 mercurial and 1 sprite: Given we're not talking about some random newbie, it's clear what he was doing here (throwing the game, while he had faqqot on enemy team)

Given most replays are broken for some odd reason (after round 1, nothing shows up besides chat - prolly due to the wc3 patch that came out or something), i can't review older replays, yet the conclusion is there: Everytime he played with faqqot, he knew exactly what he doing (with, and without advices), and while against faqqot or alone, he lost games purposely (by pretending to be new/trolling), so that he could lower his elo (There's prolly a few more names/games, but i have no clue what's faqqot new alias, so cant cross them with humanchair, altho there's a few games im almost sure that it was him) - My review and @Augustinus previous information should be enough to process it, i believe.

PS: And given how they acted with one another ingame, i'm sure faqqot knew that humanchair was morelossthanwin (You don't simply coordinate builds like that - building on opposite sides, overbuilding to catch leaks, etc.)

You have no fucking clue what you're talking about...

faQQot wrote:You have no fucking clue what you're talking about...

It's either blazeitup or morelossthanwin making a new smurf account on forums lol

faQQot wrote:You have no fucking clue what you're talking about...

Feel free to enlighten me then (cause obviously i have no clue what i'm talking about), and i'm curious, or actually interested, in learning from you

You make a brq against me for game ruining. How exactly am I game ruining?

I'm still waiting for any gameruining I have done? Hello?

faQQot wrote:You make a brq against me for game ruining. How exactly am I game ruining?

As i clarified in my post, you're not exactly game ruining - Morelossthanwin was dodging his ban (already confirmed and processed), and while doing so, he lost games purposely to lower his elo (by playing the newbie card, and trolling his teams throughout, even on games against you), and while he was with you, he never played bad, trolled - he knew exactly what he was doing (building properly, on opposite sides to suicide and let you catch, etc.)

So like i said, this is a very thin line to call it a stats boosting (given the amount of games), but don't tell me you and him dind't use that trick of letting him lower his elo alone or against you, to boost you after (while playing with you).

PS: Don't even think about claiming "i dind't knew him", cause right from his first game on HumanChair (which coincidently was played with you), he knew exactly what he was doing, and so were you, so please, don't play us for fools, thanks (In case you forgot, you can read it here - http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 332700.w3g )

Anyways, the moderators will look at the evidence reported and make the decision: If you got anything to say, i advise you to argument, and present evidence that counter the current reported (else you look like Morelossthanwin claiming he dind't dodge, those accs weren't his, as if anyone would ever believe him ... not)

Boosting players is not against the rules so again, how exactly am I game ruining?

Not that it matters but if you check the games elo gained/lost you will actually see I have more lost elo then I have gained with this player. We got like 6 games played together where he dc in 2 (on my team) and we draw, I lose 2 games with -25 and I win 2 games with +5.

So it sums up about -40 elo with him.

Nice work tho, he tked me more then he tied anyone else.


Also I dont need a defence as I didn't break any violations , other then dodging my forum ban by making this account. I'm just here for the lulz