Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11784674
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #7
Your Warcraft III Username: masterofthepit
Violator's Warcraft III Username: dbcoopers2
Violated Rule(s): game ruining/trolling
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): lvl 1, lvl 7, lvl 8,
Any further thoughts:
We had 4 hard yolo lanes and wanted to send warriors when he decided to cancel whisp and build ygg instead of aqua. This really ruined our setup to play with these yolo units. He then proceeded to random add some aquas and another ygg to leak 7 even with low push and 8 too.
His decision literally ruined our game and he should know better than that. He is not a new player after all. So please ban him for choosing a trollbuild against better knowledge when he had an amazing roll at hand.
[LTD] dbcoopers2
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: [LTD] dbcoopers2
I am the first one who thinks that coopers is a player to be dodged, and indeed i do dodge him, but this "ban him cause he didnt build what i wanted" looks like bs to me tbh..
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: [LTD] dbcoopers2
its still open pandoras box if we start banning building decissions, no way... Play ygg over aqua is not optimal but its still a "fair" decission to do yggs, come on he didnt build colt... ygg is one of best units after all
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: [LTD] dbcoopers2
The point is not that "he didn't build what I wanted". Watch the replay. He CANCELED whisp when we already called warriors to go ygg over aqua. He then didn't go hold as he called himself but mixed with random tk shit to leak with low push. His building choice is one thing, but that he just prevented the team to act on a good plan is the thing i think is banworthy.
Re: [LTD] dbcoopers2
(01:00 / Allied) KraKeN: wtf
(01:02 / Allied) KraKeN: -rolls
(01:03 / Allied) meinert: -go aq lol
(01:03 / Allied) dbcoopers2: too much yolo
...
(26:27 / Allied) masterofthepit: u clearly dont understand the yolo meta
(26:39 / Allied) masterofthepit: u prolly also think someone who leaks is bad right?
(26:56 / Allied) KraKeN: i gave up on him on start when he said 2 much yolo
Maybe on Thailand they have different vision of the game meta.
After this "2much yolo" statement all hopes for improvement of him as player were gone.
It was minute 1
!support so he can see and learn that he is doing wrong
(01:02 / Allied) KraKeN: -rolls
(01:03 / Allied) meinert: -go aq lol
(01:03 / Allied) dbcoopers2: too much yolo
...
(26:27 / Allied) masterofthepit: u clearly dont understand the yolo meta
(26:39 / Allied) masterofthepit: u prolly also think someone who leaks is bad right?
(26:56 / Allied) KraKeN: i gave up on him on start when he said 2 much yolo
Maybe on Thailand they have different vision of the game meta.
After this "2much yolo" statement all hopes for improvement of him as player were gone.
It was minute 1
!support so he can see and learn that he is doing wrong
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests