Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 514949.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #41
Your Warcraft III Username: Klaa.Hoebell
Violator's Warcraft III Username: XTC- ( https://entgaming.net/customstats/legio ... ayer/xtc-/ )
Violated Rule(s): Forcing Send / refusing to Team
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Round 17 (min 35)
Any further thoughts:
We as team talked between Round 15 and 16 about sending on which Round. We as team decided to send 18, cuze i ask and red/teal agreed.. only Purp refused and called 17, so it was sure 3:1 call.
As argument he called "im tired"... at least Round 16 starts and Purp force to send 17... so cuze his solosend would kill our game and we lose, we have to follow him... teal started to follow and red as #3... cuze of his forcesend i also have to follow him for not risking this game..
at least we won on this send 17ten but it wasnt sure at all... XTC- (s) behaviours is not aceptable even with win this game..
(33:30 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: so
(33:32 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: im for
(33:32 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: 18 CALL
(33:33 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: DD
(33:36 / Allied) undefeatedlegio: k TEAM AGREE
(33:37 / Allied) Dodobro: + TEAM AGREE
(33:46 / Allied) XTC-: go 17
(33:50 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: XD
(33:52 / Allied) Dodobro: nn
(33:55 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: we go 18
(33:59 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: u could follow or not
(34:03 / Allied) XTC-: he leaked every lvls
(34:08 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: let him juice
(34:10 / Allied) XTC-: they leaked 25 units to king
(34:10 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: idc leak or not
(34:13 / Allied) XTC-: i will send 17 REFUSE
(34:16 / Allied) Klaa.Hoebell: gl
(34:17 / Allied) XTC-: i am tired
[LTD] [BAN] XTC-
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:37 pm
Re: [LTD] [BAN] XTC-
sup its undefeatedlegio,
u left out the part where we discussed their mutants leaking every level and i agreed 17 was good send, and they proceeded to leak 61
at least include the entire chat, it wasn't a solo send, i agreed it was good idea, which it was.
u left out the part where we discussed their mutants leaking every level and i agreed 17 was good send, and they proceeded to leak 61
at least include the entire chat, it wasn't a solo send, i agreed it was good idea, which it was.
Re: [LTD] [BAN] XTC-
Reporting this guy for the same issue, so I will use this topic
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9514734
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #38
Your Warcraft III Username: gra
Violator's Warcraft III Username: XTC- ( https://entgaming.net/customstats/legio ... ayer/xtc-/ )
Violated Rule(s): Forcing Send / refusing to Team / pulling
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Round 7 (min 11) AND level 14 (min 28), pulling units on level 9
Any further thoughts:
same thing on 14.
P.S also we never knew if he was going to hold or not
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9514734
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #38
Your Warcraft III Username: gra
Violator's Warcraft III Username: XTC- ( https://entgaming.net/customstats/legio ... ayer/xtc-/ )
Violated Rule(s): Forcing Send / refusing to Team / pulling
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Round 7 (min 11) AND level 14 (min 28), pulling units on level 9
Any further thoughts:
Code: Select all
(10:38 / Allied) gra: all ok with furbmit?
(10:44 / Allied) undefeatedlegio: y
(10:45 / Allied) gra: or not?
(10:49 / Allied) gra: yellow?
(11:52 / Allied) XTC-: send <-- forces full send
same thing on 14.
P.S also we never knew if he was going to hold or not
Code: Select all
(02:31 / Allied) gra: u holder green?
(02:48 / Allied) gra: 3 cavas?
(03:44 / Allied) XTC-: i dont talk to retards
(03:46 / Allied) XTC-: end of story
Last edited by wawa on Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 3:30 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: [LTD] [BAN] XTC-
@Die_Uhrzeit
Your post has absolutely nothing to do with this post here. Furthermore, you may want to review the situation before spreading untruths.
@cantwakeup
They were exactly our opinion and also for a send on 18. They have only been persuaded because he has been actively forced to send. Furthermore, if we did not send together, we knew that we would lose the game! These are the only two reasons why they finally sent 18.
Your post has absolutely nothing to do with this post here. Furthermore, you may want to review the situation before spreading untruths.
@cantwakeup
They were exactly our opinion and also for a send on 18. They have only been persuaded because he has been actively forced to send. Furthermore, if we did not send together, we knew that we would lose the game! These are the only two reasons why they finally sent 18.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests