[DOTA] sniperbarahusk@uswest

[aqf]

Violator's Warcraft III username: sniperbarahusk
Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #79
Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2911616
Rule player violated: mh
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer):
30:23 <sniperBARAhusk> 0x19: Select subgroup: [Roshan], 0x00007AB400007988
->32:24 Player: sniperBARAhusk 0x19: Select subgroup [id='n00L', object=0x00007AB400007988]

30:46 <sniperBARAhusk> 0x19: Select subgroup: [Thunder Lizard], 0x000183F600007699
->32:47 Player: sniperBARAhusk 0x19: Select subgroup [id='n0LD', object=0x000183F600007699]

30:46 <sniperBARAhusk> 0x19: Select subgroup: [Thunder Lizard], 0x000183D000005DCB
->32:48 Player: sniperBARAhusk 0x19: Select subgroup [id='n0LD', object=0x000183D000005DCB]

Any further thoughts:
sniperbarahusk banned 1 year for mh

[horizon]

I am posting here because the previous ban appeal thread appears to be locked for some reason. I would like to begin by stating that upon learning the person who is overseeing this ban is in fact the same person that I played with during this game, it has come to my attention that there is a very obvious conflict of interests. I would request that this ban be re-examined by someone other than the person who was in the game with me, so that there is no bias. As such, I would also like to request access to the entire printout of the game in question (referring to the "time of incidents"), so that I may examine an empirical version of what transpired during the game and conduct my own research. I would also like to understand more about the nature of the ban, as there are other DotA players using the same internet connection who use the ENT servers to play their games; i.e. what methods are used to differentiate accounts linked to me as opposed to the others that play. Thank you.

[aRt)Y]

@horizon Spend less time on writing but more on reading.

The replay is given, so are the clicks and time. You can go through the replay with your vision and see, you didn't have vision.
In the awaiting section, a second mod will review the ban and either approve or deny it - until then, you'll have to wait and post an appeal afterwards.

[JunZzi]

32:47 Player: sniperBARAhusk 0x19: Select subgroup [id='n0LD', object=0x000183F600007699]
32:48 Player: sniperBARAhusk 0x19: Select subgroup [id='n0LD', object=0x000183D000005DCB]

Approved on same clicks.

Moved to Processed.