Bugg
Moderator: LIHL Staff
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:26 pm
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Bugg
I remember this game where the balance was a bit off:
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=1548130
It was about:
Diablo 1060
Furb 1140
Duck 1120
Hele 850
So if the balancing is made purely by ELO, Duck and Furb had to be swapped.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=1548130
It was about:
Diablo 1060
Furb 1140
Duck 1120
Hele 850
So if the balancing is made purely by ELO, Duck and Furb had to be swapped.
-----
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK
- dweiler
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
Re: Bugg
About the ELO, it is possible that big differences arise in winning/losing ELO, especially in 2v2. If you for example have those 4 players: 1400, 1101, 1100, 700 ELO, then the 1400+1100 will pair up and the 1101 and 700 ELO. This way a win/loss of 22/-8 can easily occur.
The example given where duckie and furb have resp. 1120 and 1140 ELO, it could easily have happened that the ELO changed (that the ELO from the previous game was adjusted) just before or after the signing process, in which case it might have been right at the time of signing, but it seems wrong now.
I have been watching the autobalance myself the last days, and I haven't found any irregularities in it. I think we should keep watching if the bot autobalances right, but there is no need for action at this moment.
Please do post when you find irregularities (again), because the bots SHOULD be auto-balancing.
The example given where duckie and furb have resp. 1120 and 1140 ELO, it could easily have happened that the ELO changed (that the ELO from the previous game was adjusted) just before or after the signing process, in which case it might have been right at the time of signing, but it seems wrong now.
I have been watching the autobalance myself the last days, and I haven't found any irregularities in it. I think we should keep watching if the bot autobalances right, but there is no need for action at this moment.
Please do post when you find irregularities (again), because the bots SHOULD be auto-balancing.
You don't stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.
- dweiler
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
Re: Bugg
Oh lol my bad, you are right, I mixed up numbers
My example shud be : 1400, 702,701,700. Then 1400 and 700 get teamed and 702 and 701, which leads to a big difference.
Oh, and btw, I have seen now with my own eyes that the autobalance does fuck up when you play with furbolg. Could this be because of his '2nd' acc (that is the 0-1 acc that was created because of no spoofcheck)? @Uakf.b

Oh, and btw, I have seen now with my own eyes that the autobalance does fuck up when you play with furbolg. Could this be because of his '2nd' acc (that is the 0-1 acc that was created because of no spoofcheck)? @Uakf.b
You don't stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.
Re: Bugg
I think i got a double account also; when i setup my Gproxy i had it on uswest; i think i had some matches played via gproxy on uswest leaving me with double elo acc also. My lobby stats are different than my useast stats
- dweiler
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
Re: Bugg
The issue should be solved now. If there still are problems with balancing, please make a new topic. Moving this to archive.
You don't stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests