DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

General discussion about Warcraft III and Enterprise.
SeriouslyStrange
Poison Treant
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:16 am
Location: Houston
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 29 times

DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby SeriouslyStrange » Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:47 pm

Can all the players that WANT to play the new dota game, please reply here?
The bot that is hosting the game is always empty (ENT51) and perhaps it's because people don't know or something.
I really want to play, but no use in waiting hours for a game that wont begin.
Let's just play nice.
NOT!

Larz

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby Larz » Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:34 pm

maybe we can get it advertised on the other bots @hazardous

User avatar
HazarDous
Staff Department
Posts: 9051
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:36 pm
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 227 times

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby HazarDous » Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:44 pm

Already did, @larz

ForReports
Armored Tree
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:52 pm

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby ForReports » Sun Oct 16, 2016 12:55 pm

6.51k map is very bad. To boring ot even play it and all heroes are changed to much. When you play that map is like giving up dota.

Dota-Reaper
Armored Tree
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2014 10:44 pm

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby Dota-Reaper » Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:08 pm

yea...that map has issues.

Ryan
Aura Tree
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:49 pm

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby Ryan » Sat Oct 22, 2016 2:44 am

How doesn't one find this new map?!? XD

Emperor

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby Emperor » Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:05 am

Agreed that there was a poll taken and it was like 94% in favor of keeping current map over 6.51...

Sylvanas
Treant Protector
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:56 am
Been thanked: 159 times

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby Sylvanas » Mon Nov 07, 2016 2:57 am

ForReports wrote:6.51k map is very bad. To boring ot even play it and all heroes are changed to much. When you play that map is like giving up dota.

It's actually keeping up with dota. I think 6.83 should be abandoned entirely, just like every other version before it. Each time, there was people complaining EVERYTHING WAS RUINED FOREVER, which never happened. Nobody asked for their permission to switch to the most recent map and everything has always been fine.

Anyway I would play it. b.net dota/ent has just gotten way too averse to change. Either you have to force it on them or you have to find those willing to move on and organize games with them. The bot games aren't going to work since everyone interested in them simultaneously considers no one else will join.
These users thanked the author Sylvanas for the post:
SeriouslyStrange (Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:28 pm)

SeriouslyStrange
Poison Treant
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:16 am
Location: Houston
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby SeriouslyStrange » Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:30 pm

The main reason that most people didn't want to make the switch was because there was no "EM" mode anymore.
Which would delete all the one click heroes, and would make actually playing as a team a necessary thing.
No EM means no more autoattacking huskar at mid, no afk farming LC, or Meepo with Scepter and Skadi at minute 10.
Which pissed people off.
Like Sylvanas said, I personally think if it isn't forced on people, then people will simply say no. This EM playstyle is more of "I can solo farm faster, and solo win this game". Which is just ridiculous.
Let's just play nice.
NOT!

Sylvanas
Treant Protector
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:56 am
Been thanked: 159 times

Re: DOTA New Map 6.51k Players

Postby Sylvanas » Tue Nov 08, 2016 12:55 am

I find it ridiculous that the exclusion of em made it a "em vs non-em" question for a lot of people instead of "updated vs old". It would be better to just give them em and move on to the new map than to keep not giving them em and move on to... nothing. In my opinion, both sides are being retarded about this, but dracolich is the one that's best able to do something about it.

Never understood why em/non-em is such a big deal to people. It's pretty noticeable early on, but much less so as the game progresses. Non em is better balanced, since it encourages a mixed team composition, but both are completely playable. I personally play arem only, because everyone doesn't necessarily get to pick whichever heroes you feel take advantage of em. That and I wouldn't stand playing the same hero/few heroes every game and couldn't bring myself not to because then I'd feel like I'm not taking full advantage of my pick.


Return to “General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests