Bans
- Arii
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 5912
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 1:21 am
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
- Contact:
Re: Bans
@Slomosapien
Moderators have a recommended ban duration for certain violations, but in most cases, it is generally at the discretion of the mod reviewing the case.
Moderators have a recommended ban duration for certain violations, but in most cases, it is generally at the discretion of the mod reviewing the case.
Having an unstable internet connection or a high risk of lagging out? Are you tired of losing a won game because you disconnected?
- ENT Connect is a on LAN connection based reconnection tool (no cd-keys needed).
- GProxy++(Varlock) is a reconnection tool for the battle.net with an external prompt.
- GProxy++ DLL is a reconnection plugin for battle.net (Recommended).
- HazarDous
- Staff Department
- Posts: 9051
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
Re: Bans
To add to what Arii said, moderators may sometime go over or below the guidelines under specific situation(s). i.e, someone who commits a repeated offense will be banned above the recommended guidelines.
Does that answer your question?
Does that answer your question?
- Slomosapien
- Treant
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:12 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
- HazarDous
- Staff Department
- Posts: 9051
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
Re: Bans
This information is not public for the very reason that ban durations are only guidelines. The ban lenght you, hypothetically, receive for team killing may not be the same duration I will get for TK. We do not have static ban durations as we trust our moderators to be qualified to judge ban requests on a case by case basis - mainly according to intention and impact on the game of broken rules -. We prefer this to applying the same ban duration for every same broken rule because each case has its specificities and we cannot anticipate them.
Furthermore, making these guidelines public would only encourage people to cry every time X or Y ban lenght does not exactly meet the recommende duration. If you believe you have been banned for too long, you may post an appeal, and ask for another moderator than the one who banned you to deal with it.
What offense(s)' duration would you like to debate and why?
Furthermore, making these guidelines public would only encourage people to cry every time X or Y ban lenght does not exactly meet the recommende duration. If you believe you have been banned for too long, you may post an appeal, and ask for another moderator than the one who banned you to deal with it.
What offense(s)' duration would you like to debate and why?
- Slomosapien
- Treant
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:12 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bans
In that scenario, the verdict doesn't make clear sense to me. Why should you get a different ban than me? Why not have standardized ban durations? If there's a repeat in a short time, the make another echelon of ban (like double to time if there's a repeat in s short time). Then people don't have to petition to be unbanned from a mod who wasn't in a good mood at that day. That way there's no "crying" at x or y, just the rules, which are clearly stated and uniform.
What sparked this was the one-year bans (which I've seen a few of lately). Safe to say that person is never coming back to this DotA. It might as well be forever. A one-year ban for maphack seems sortof reasonable, since you're shutting out a person who would overtly and consciously cheat. But, a one-year ban for dodging a small ban (router reset or making an account on another server), seems pretty severe. I don't know that it's fair to 'permanently' ban someone for circumventing the "authority" of ENT agents in the same way as someone who is cheating. I mean that person is not going to learn a lesson of any kind.. they are going to go to a different game and the small DotA community becomes even smaller.
There are likely other examples, but this was the most recent one I came across..
What sparked this was the one-year bans (which I've seen a few of lately). Safe to say that person is never coming back to this DotA. It might as well be forever. A one-year ban for maphack seems sortof reasonable, since you're shutting out a person who would overtly and consciously cheat. But, a one-year ban for dodging a small ban (router reset or making an account on another server), seems pretty severe. I don't know that it's fair to 'permanently' ban someone for circumventing the "authority" of ENT agents in the same way as someone who is cheating. I mean that person is not going to learn a lesson of any kind.. they are going to go to a different game and the small DotA community becomes even smaller.
There are likely other examples, but this was the most recent one I came across..
Re: Bans
@Slomosapien Regarding ban duration, you can't properly "standardize" it: Sure you can have basic guidelines/durations, but impact, repeated offenses, intentions will differ the duration itself.
Dodging a ban (may it be an autoban, a teamkill, maphack ban, etc) is not something you should take "lightly": Someone who decides to dodge a ban, instead of appealing it, simply shows that besides not caring/respecting rules at all, is willing to go as far as dodging his bans, to continue playing, and usually doesn't take long until you find them, again, breaking the initial rule which lead to his ban (speaking by personal experience).
Also all bans are appealable, and generally, all the moderators are quite flexible if people cooperate, and show that they learned their lesson, and promise to try doing different in the future (Sometimes it works, others it doens't, but that's how it is: You either take the gamble, and believe the person learned, and reduce his ban/unban him, or you simply keep him banned ^^)
Dodging a ban (may it be an autoban, a teamkill, maphack ban, etc) is not something you should take "lightly": Someone who decides to dodge a ban, instead of appealing it, simply shows that besides not caring/respecting rules at all, is willing to go as far as dodging his bans, to continue playing, and usually doesn't take long until you find them, again, breaking the initial rule which lead to his ban (speaking by personal experience).
Also all bans are appealable, and generally, all the moderators are quite flexible if people cooperate, and show that they learned their lesson, and promise to try doing different in the future (Sometimes it works, others it doens't, but that's how it is: You either take the gamble, and believe the person learned, and reduce his ban/unban him, or you simply keep him banned ^^)
- wTc[JediMaster]
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 4:12 pm
- Location: Northrend - Clan wTc
- Been thanked: 32 times
- Contact:
Re: Bans
@Arii @Hyo @HazarDous What is the longest time for an autoban? from what Ive seen it's around 1-4h mostly aslo waiting for it to pass works "just as fast" as asking ENT to unban if it was unfair or you feel like leaveing them of the hook.
not really as fast if it's passed quickly but just playing 1-2 other games while waiting mostly solves the problem
not really as fast if it's passed quickly but just playing 1-2 other games while waiting mostly solves the problem


______________________________________________
May The Force Be With You! & Have a wormTastic game!
Clan wTc Site, Info + Games & Forum
Re: Bans
Hmm there's no "longest" defined, but if i had to call by memory, i've seen autobans lasting for at least 5 days, back in the days
Autoban is calculated with a series of variables, including stay %, amount of autobans you got in the last days, for how long the game lasted vs when you disconnected, etc , so you won't necessarily have a standard autoban duration
Autoban is calculated with a series of variables, including stay %, amount of autobans you got in the last days, for how long the game lasted vs when you disconnected, etc , so you won't necessarily have a standard autoban duration

- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Bans
Circumstances.Slomosapien wrote:Why should you get a different ban than me?
If he tks you at the end, the impact might be way lower than at the beginning when it might ruin your entire start. Thus, ENT judges the reports based on multiple criteria to enforce reasonable and fair bans. However, mhing and dodging crosses a line we do not tolerate. But as mentioned, we are open for talks (aka appeals).
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
Return to “General Discussions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests